Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Couples at Tackle? Discuss.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

I believe that him being able to do it at UNC-CHapel Hill shows that he can be that versatile player in a 3-4 or 4-3 scheme. I honestly believe that he may not be there at 9 for us to pick because of the simple fact that he will have a great combine, and some of those teams picking before us can't afford to pass him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is going to be an IMPACT pass rusher off the edge. Could he contribute inside? Yeah. But that only adds to his value IMO. If he stays motivated and in shape he's going to be a good one. Wouldn't take him off the edge and try to convert him (just draft Brockers if that's your goal) but I would play him in long passing situations on the inside sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C-O-P-L-E-S

why do people keep spelling it wrong? is it that hard to spell.

Coples would be a major reach at 9. The most over-rated player in the draft. He is not good and I don't want him on the Panther's roster.

The simple fact that his EASY name is spelled wrong by the huddle now is enough to warrant the hunch that we'll draft him to be coached by Riviera, to work along side Connor when we RESIGN him. I just hope Steven Smith doesn't punch him in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...