Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aside From Qb, What Positions Are Lowest In Priority?


Zod

Recommended Posts

I'd say one safety spot is locked down. The FO commited to Godfrey long term.. he can play both safety spots, so not sure which one to peg him at.

TE and MLB are not going to be early picks for sure.. I think OT could be put on the list.. althought I think a lot of people could disagree.. I just don't see us putting OT in the same class of 'need' as most other positions on our team (this year).

In summary:

QB, RB, FB, WR1, TE, OT, C, RDE, CB1, MLB, S, LS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we talking starters or depth or both? This year or long term or both?

Reality is you can justify drafting any position for either depth or long term strategy. And teams are always only an injury away...

With Williams Stewart Tolbert and Goodson, RB is probably the closest to being a non-priority but contracts and fumbles are still concerns for 3 of those players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I one of the only people on this board who believes we are set at DE??

Probably....Hardy is weak against the run and average as a pass rusher. That white kid made more noise than hardy.

CJ misses any time....potential worst DL in the league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...