Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Death Of My Panthers Razor


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I just can't seem to find that perfect razor. I've tried the expensive ones and the cheap ones. I've vacillated between disposables and cartridges over the years. I used to swear by my Mach 3, but moved on when they added four and five blades to a cartridge. More has to be better right?

I thought I was really progressing when I bought my first Gillette Fusion ProGlide (and I disposed of my Schick Quattro immediately). Nothing could be better than a powered razor with five blades. But, alas, after a few cuts, I decided that the ProGlide was more hype than anything else. From there, I reluctantly went back to Schick: This time, I'd try the much ballyhooed Hydro 5. I hated to admit to myself that the Hydro 5 gave me a pretty nice shave. Smooth. The gel reservoirs, whether I admitted it or not, were light years better than the green strips. Plus, it had a pivoting head that I could pull down to do more precise trimming. It was still a Schick, and my subconscious mind wouldn't allow me to choose Schick over the venerable Gillette.

As fate would have it, while roaming through Wal-Mart one day as the wife shopped for some groceries, I spied a Panthers sign on top of a display of manual Fusion ProGlides for $9.98. Panthers! I just couldn't refuse that little Panthers logo, housed beautifully underneath the acrylic on that handle. I had to get it. Who cares that I had a powered ProGlide at the house? I had to get the Panthers razor.

As fate would have it, after using the Panthers razor for a while, suffering through mild bouts of razor burn, and burning through the measly two cartridges included in the box, I was wondering why I had ever switched. I kept using it though because it was a Panthers razor. It was Gillette. The NFL had a partnership with Gillette. I love my Panthers! Well, again, strolling through Wal-Mart weeks later, I was pricing replacement cartridges for my beloved Panthers razor when I got a mild case of sticker shock. I was lamenting the price, so I decided to walk around and commiserate about my dilemma when what do I see? A display of beautiful boxes of Shick Hydro 5 razors. Included in the boxes were not only my much yearned for Hydro 5, even if it was subconsciously, but also 6 cartridges, some Hydro 5 shaving gel and some Degree deodorant, all for $9.98. After comparing the prices of the ProGlide and the Hydro 5 cartridges, I had to do the unthinkable.

My Panthers razor is lying in state at the top of my sink, and I just had the closest thing to a perfect shave than I have had in a few months. I think you know the answer to the tough decision that I had to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I chose stuff just for the logo I'd have to drink miller lite. yuck!

A good friend of mine has the last name Miller, so he had been drinking it for the longest time until (at his wedding no-less) he told everyone at the reception "This stuff is fugging gross." And just sat down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...