Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just a Though on Replacement Refs


1989

Recommended Posts

I know they have made some terrible calls but I enjoy how overall they seem to let the guys play more. Not calling a lot of roughing the passers or minor pass interference calls has made the game slightly more enjoyable to watch.

TD ROCKED Brees yesterday after he passed the ball for what would have surely been a roughing the passer call with normal refs in. I believe this was in the 3rd quarter with the Saints* backed up against their own goal line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These new refs might not be the most experienced or consistent, but they let the players play. Whether its intentional, because of inexperience, or because of mistakes, it's refreshing to watch. I haven't seen defenses being allowed to play so aggressively in years. The old refs gave offenses too much of an advantage. I say good riddance to the former refs for having to be so uptight about every rule (also good riddance for not being grateful for being employed).

I know it's a lame reason to hate the old refs, for doing their job "too well", but they make the game boring and sometimes embarrassing to watch. I don't want to see arena league offenses averaging 50 points a game, I want to see some football. It's really not the old refs fault though, it's the fault of the rules that they enforce so well. I don't know if it's possible for this kind of reffing to continue onto next season, but it's good for as long as it lasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These refs have been making some questionable calls (no-calls?) that I think are going to come back to bite someone; probably the NFL in their negotiations with the normal officials.

They could ignore taking forever to make a call and really blowing some that have a lot of impact on gameplay (extra timeout near the end of the game for Seattle? Hurr Durr) but with the league embroiled in player safety lawsuits and making safety the buzz-word of the Goodell era this apparent timidity on the part of the replacements is going to become more and more of a problem for them.

That decapitation in the Seattle / Dallas game is going to be making the rounds this week for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...