Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Observation on the season so far - a big picture look (resident pessimists don't bother reading)


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

I was just watching the Saints game a little to put me in more of a positive mood going into Sunday's game and I got to thinking about something. So far this season seems to have some parallels to last season, but with a slight improvement. I'm not talking about any particular stats or anything, just the big picture at the 3 games we've played so far. Here's the comparisons of our 3 games so far to 3 games last year, with an explanation on how this season shows a little growth over their counterpart games from last year.

Week 1: This game is similar to the Arizona game in that we started the season on the road against a presumably weak team and got a bit of a surprise. Disappointing start to the season. Positive outlook - I think the Bucs team that beat us is better than the Arizona team that beat us last year.

Week 2: This game is similar to our first game against the Saints last year in that it was a home game and our first game against the Saints. Both games were relatively high scoring. Last year's game was a little closer throughout the game. Positive outlook - Last year we were winning late in the game but couldn't stop Brees from completing the comeback win. This year we stopped the potentially game-tying final drive. That shows me an improvement in maturity.

Week 3: This game is similar to the Tennessee game last year in that we got blown the fug out and our offense looked nothing like we know it to be capable of being. Both were home game embarrassments. Positive outlook - At least this year we got embarrassed by the Super Bowl champs and not a mid tier team. Hopefully now that we got the tragedy game out of the way, we can hunker down and perform like we did in the last 1/3 of the season last year.

Yes, I know our defense so far has looked possibly even worse than last year, and in our small sample size so far our offense looks to have taken a nose dive but I'm looking at the big picture here, not the details.

If last year was any indication, this week's game is building up to be like last year's game against Detroit. The game after we get embarrassed, looks to be a high scoring game. Hopefully this time our defense doesn't melt down in the second half and we let the game get away from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed with all that.

i've been looking at that NYG game as being like the titan's embarrassing game as well...same with the upcoming falcons game being like that lions game. better performance away against a team that really is supposed to beat us.

what i'm hoping is that the team needs(needed) an embarrassing loss to catalyst them to the next level in the season. i'm just glad it happened early this year if that's the case.

i think they are close to having things click for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why has it become a trend every season that it takes half the season to click?

We haven't really had this team long enough to have a trend. You have to reset the clock when Rivera comes on board and we draft a proper QB.

I know tendency is to use the past to prove the future but in football, in the age of free agency and fluidity especially, that just isn't the case typically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't really had this team long enough to have a trend. You have to reset the clock when Rivera comes on board and we draft a proper QB.

I know tendency is to use the past to prove the future but in football, in the age of free agency and fluidity especially, that just isn't the case typically.

why reset the clock when the present matches the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you believe we'll go around 8-8/9-7, OP?

Depends, if they bounce back this week and at least play a competitive game then yea, I'd guess anywhere between 8-8 and 10-6. If they lay another stinker, I could see us being as bad as 4-12. If they actually manage to win, there's not a team left on our schedule I don't think we have a good chance of beating. There's no team left on our schedule that looks as good as Atlanta right now, so it'd all depend on how many games they decide to sleep through like last week. I'd guess anywhere from 8-8 (if they continue the trend if alternating off and on games) to 14-2 if they play to the fullest of their capabilities for 13 more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, what can change the entire season is riding on our first drives on each side of the ball respectively.

If we stop ATL, it could do wonders for our team.

If we score first - even 3 points, it sets us up with momentum... Something we've yet to have starting any of our games.

Our DEFENSE absolutely has to show up and show out. If they don't, the wind is out of the sails and it's business as usual. They need a stop for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6-10 to 9-7... I honestly think we can win against the dirtyturds. Think the biggest keys to the two losses,was letting the games get out of control early. That's on the D. The O also sputtered in those games. Anyone else think that with the injuries the NYGs had, the team thought they had an easy W and didn't play their hardest!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, what can change the entire season is riding on our first drives on each side of the ball respectively.

If we stop ATL, it could do wonders for our team.

If we score first - even 3 points, it sets us up with momentum... Something we've yet to have starting any of our games.

Our DEFENSE absolutely has to show up and show out. If they don't, the wind is out of the sails and it's business as usual. They need a stop for themselves.

agreed.

that first drive, set of possessions sets the tone for the game. if we can just stop the falcons from scoring at all on their first drive it will do a ton for morale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...