Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are the Panthers attractive to a GM prospect?


Zod

Recommended Posts

If I am a high level executive looking at prospective employers, no matter the industry, I am first going to look at the task at hand. What will my responsibilities be, what will I need to fix or improve. Will I be given the support from the owner or board to fix those issues? Or am I being set up to fail?

Surely these are the same things any GM will be asking.

When I see the Panthers, I see a team with a couple extremely talented young players, but also a good number of cap heavy older non producers. I also see ownership that isn't exactly eager to aggressively seek out free agents to fill holes unless left no other option.

So, I would line up the pros and cons...

Pros

An owner that is loyal. Previous GM had longevity through losing seasons.

2 potential young all pro players at key positions, QB and MLB

3rd year coach with system in place, not starting over

Team seemed to rally late in the year, being 6-2

Cons

A complete mess of a cap

Major cuts needed right away to long term vets, leadership and chemistry will take a hit

Ownership is not exactly eager to sign free agents or trades to fill holes unless last resort

3rd year coach who can't seem to win games against quality teams

An overall tradition of losing.

The way I see it, the Carolina GM job isn't extremely attractive, but it isn't terrible either. It's somewhere in the middle of the pack.

Top notch GM candidates will have better opportunities and take them. Secondary prospects will see the Panthers as an opportunity to impress.

Beane being a secondary prospect and already in house gives him the edge. See loyalty above. All things point to him being our guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stadium that needs renovation factor into the decision? At one time, it was touted as a tool to attract quality free agents, now it's old and stale.

I know plans are in the works, but is its current state a factor?

I would also add in a little too much interference from ownership in how he assembles his coaching staff and roster as a big negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all heard it before in the Huddle and this post, in some respects, is no different.

As far as I'm concerned, a prospective GM is interviewing the owner as much as vice versa to answer some of the very questions you posed:

1. An owner that is loyal. Where does that loyalty lie? Is it with the ownership group that cares about little else except the bottom line or is there any loyalty toward the fan base, without whom your stadium would not have been built?

2. 3rd year coach with system in place, not starting over. What system? 6-10 to 7-9 with an offense that clearly regressed the first 9 weeks of the season and had a second year QB playing worse than he did the third week of his rookie season without the benefit of training camp? So, what exactly is the system and what is the vision?

3. Ownership is not exactly eager to sign free agents or trades to fill holes unless last resort. Sometimes it is a necessity to sign a talented free agent if for no other reason than a stop-gap measure until someone is developed enough to start.

4. 3rd year coach who can't seem to win games against quality teams. An overall tradition of losing. I combined these two as I think they both relate back to the first question on the list. This is the most important conversation any prospective GM can have with the owner because, as blasphemous as it may sound, there are owners out there who couldn't care less about the team's performance as long as the bottom line is black, and JR may be one of those- and I promise you nobody on this board knows for certain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stadium that needs renovation factor into the decision? At one time, it was touted as a tool to attract quality free agents, now it's old and stale.

I don't believe so for a GM. If it was Danny Morrison's job, then yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe so for a GM. If it was Danny Morrison's job, then yes.

I kind of figured, but what is the current state of the things we don't see? Training facilities, etc.? That's what I'm thinking of here, but I have no idea how they compare to others.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tradition of losing thing I'm wonder to some extent if its not more of a angry fans fantasy then a reality.

For example teams that we've had more success then over the last 10 years then.

Browns

Jags

Dolphins

Bucs

Falcons

Cowboys

Redskins

Jets - close but we've been to a Super Bowl and they haven't

Bills

Texans

Titans

Broncos

Bengals

Vikings

Raiders

Rams

49ers - sucked till Jim got there

Cardinals - only 1 really good season

Every one of those teams an argument can be made that we have been better then and that's just off the top of my head.

Now if you are talking about just in the last 3-4 years then yes, but I think that could be easily remedied with cutting a few of our over paid vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been thinking that it will either be Arcosi (the guy we brought in to help us find a new GM) or Beane... Perhaps even a combination of the two honestly...

I just find it odd that Arcosi was brought in to consult and has done so for what.. Like 13 weeks now? Who knows the organization better than he and Beane at this point? Arcosi has GM experience... Just a thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are only 32 of these jobs in the league. We have a franchise QB in place and an owner that was extremely patient with the previous GM. Some of you guys are such self loathers it's embarrassing. Of course we have a lot to offer GM candidates. Every team that fires a GM is in a state of chaos, that is why they fired their GM. I think other factors come into play here... prospects of winning, quality of life, taxes, and pay. The only legitimate concern is ole JR low balling our guy with a short term deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...