Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gamble anxious to take on opposition's top receiver


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

he admits it was a frustrating day because he wanted to face Fitzgerald one-on-one.

“It was kind of frustrating, but you have to play what’s called,” Gamble said. “I wish I could have been on him… I felt like that game I wanted to play on him because I felt like they were going to go to him a lot. I was ready to play him.”

on the meeks DEF

I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/Read.aspx?Story=1101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

damn, Fox still controlling poo as usual.. lmao..

I'm glad to see Gamble's confidence..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“It was kind of frustrating, but you have to play what’s called,” Gamble said. “I wish I could have been on him… I felt like that game I wanted to play on him because I felt like they were going to go to him a lot. I was ready to play him.”

So glad that son of a b*tch Turdovac is gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I like it because you don’t have to think that much,” Gamble said. “You just go out and play fast and try to make plays. So I like it simple.”

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

That's what I keep saying.

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

And it looked like we were getting good results. Then the bye week where they must have starting installing more complexity and we go to hell in a handbag. Would be nice to know what took place. In the end though it probably doesn't matter since he is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Yup, then Fox and Trgo started throwing other poo in there during the bye week and cagged it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be weird or anything, but wasn't that the way the Defense played last season in the first half before things changed?

Didn't they say they were "dumbing down the Defense" in not so specific terms, to let the guys "not think as much" and go out and "play their game"?

Kinda too early to read into that cause we are just out of OTAs. I mean if your installing a new system you dont want to make it super hard to learn cause thats when you see a lag like in the second half of last year. Besides zone coverage is not all that hard for a CB if you think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...