Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Brett Jensen (WFNZ) Vegas only has Panthers favored in 4 games


SCP

Recommended Posts

Tough schedule + Subpar coaching = Vegas has no faith.

We are a 3.5 pt. home dog against the Seahawks and only a 1 pt. favorite against the Bills. 6.5 pt dog against the 9ers and 3.5 home dog against the Pats.

Place your bets. I'd take the action on those first two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vegas isn't just about getting people to put money on games....

We haven't had a winning record in almost a half decade. Only way to get people to bet on us is to give us points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seahawks first game of the season across country, yes please, if that game was in Seattle I would say its a push but with that being a home game for us I would go with us.

I think we are a lot better then the bills, because you know.... We have a offense

Idk about the pats or 9ers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where do they have the cowboys?

 

Every year Vegas grossly overvalues the cowboys and has them as favorites in way more games than they should. They do this of course because there is a massive amount of idiot bandwagon cowboys fans that will bet on them anyway. I'm sure Vegas makes a killing by making these intentionally unbalanced lines. I haven't even looked but I don't expect this year to be any different.

 

Someone mentioned blindly betting on the Panthers every week, you can actually blindly bet against the cowboys every week and make money overall. This has held true for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...