Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell Goes After Beason and Johnsons Contracts


Recommended Posts

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9518181/bill-barnwell-breaks-worst-contracts-nfl

 

inebacker: Jon Beason, Panthers
Contract Flaw: Falling in Love With a Player They Shouldn't Have

People in and around the Carolina organization swear that Jon Beason was healthy when he signed his contract extension before the 2011 season, but Beason couldn't practice that summer before the deal, didn't practice after the deal was signed in camp, suffered a season-ending Achilles injury in Week 1 of 2011, and then limped through four games in 2012 before hitting the IR again with a knee injury that required microfracture surgery. He restructured his deal last week to lower his base salary from just over $5 million to $1 million, but he's still in the middle of a six-year, $53 million deal with a $20 million signing bonus that makes him virtually uncuttable; the Panthers would have had to absorb a $13.3 million dead-money charge on their cap this year to do so, and that figure will be at $8 million next year. Beason was a very good player once, but this was a disastrous contract.

 

 

Defensive End: Charles Johnson, Panthers
Contract Flaw: Falling in Love With a Player They Shouldn't Have

Johnson is a genuinely good player whom the Panthers were right to re-sign, but they waited until after his breakout year to do so. To prevent him from hitting the free-agent market, deposed general manager Marty Hurney gave Johnson an astounding six-year, $76 million contract that guaranteed him $32 million and made him one of the highest-paid players in the NFL. Since then, Johnson has been a good defensive end, but he's not the sort of dominant player who would even come close to justifying that sort of contract.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was going to get high twenties/high sixties from atlanta if the panthers hadn't pounced.

Beasons contract is irrelevant since he blinked so hard when gettleman stared him down.

Regardless the man who made the deals is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, Julius Peppers anyone? That contract he signed was worse than Johnson's and he's played worse than Johnson.

Someone take this phrase fashion it into a club and beat the writer of this article in the face with it until he forms a proper opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We signed Johnson because we didn't want him going to Atlanta. Although, that whole thing was probably him blowing smoke up the Panther's asses. He played Hurney like a fiddle.

Beason was a top 5 MLB before being injured.

Atlanta was very legitimately going after Johnson. He lives in atlanta, went to UGA, and lots of people here assumed it was a done deal.

Then hurney came down and made it raaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiinn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with those that said Beason's was a bad contract.  Johnson has been a great player that until Hardy emerged in 2012 was really him and no one else.  He was constantly double teamed in 2011 and still had double digit sacks. Even last year without a big middle presence he still got doubled too much.  All that is about to change.  The sacks are going up this year but it is because of a middle presence and more linebackers who are not being shuffled in from series to series.  Also Johnson's contract was so big because of our disasterous 2010 and the fact he was the highest rated FA DE when his contract was up.  Imagine if he hadn't paid Johnson, it would been disasterous to the whole team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the absolute ceiling is 5 with Bryce. I’m expecting 3. They will absolutely beat the Saints at least once, maybe twice. 
    • The offense made a turnover that resulted in a TD. You take that TD off the board and this would have been an entirely different game. I think Evero has the same problems that Canales has. I think they are both handcuffed to some degree due to a talent deficiency on their side of the ball. Canales doesn't have a QB capable of running his scheme. Evero doesn't have enough talent on his side to be effective in his scheme. Our highest paid d-lineman is a good run defender but contributes little to our pass rush. None of LBs would start on a contending team. Our current starting  safeties don't make impact plays. Only 2 of our 11 starters (Brown, Horn) have to be accounted for on each play. Some of this may still be their fault. It appears both have lobbied for players (via FA or the draft)who haven't contributed much. They seem hesitant to play their younger players or remain loyal to guys who just don't produce when they are on the field. As bad as this team is, you'd think they'd be dedicated to getting the young guys on the field as much as possible. Wasting #1 picks on Young and Legette and questionable selections on the defensive side of the ball has set this team back for years.
    • I think we saw exactly who Bryce Young is on the final drive of the game.
×
×
  • Create New...