Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ginn looked good


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

Target the guy more and give him more chances to perform.  Boost his confidence. Coach him up a little more in the film room.  He's got the potential to put a TD on the board every single game, not counting returns, but you have to throw the ball his way, and I don't mean ten yards in front of him.  He has a powerful afterburner, but not one that fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm calling it. Steve, Ginn, Hixon. Resign Gettis and cut Edwards. I'm an Armanti fan but for FUG sake he is just not quick enough to be a threat. We need speed with the incompetent line we have. We also need another veteran besides Smith for some leadership in Hixon.

What scares me is that Shula did not attempt to get Rogers on Smith. Smith would've eaten him alive and a hurry up offense could've made that happen. I watched Rogers get eaten up by Armanti to Brian Quick while he was at Richmond so anything less than him being burned up would be a serious disappointment. Ginn alligator armed one deep ball but if Cam hits one in four of those 50 yard passes it's a success. He had one that was caught for a TD and one Ginn alligator armed out of around 5 deep balls that traveled well over 50 yards in the air.

Was today a success? No, but I hate the "billieve" moniker and we just became an example and highlight reel for the Bills if they do nothing else this year. An 0-2 Giants team under Coughlin may be vulnerable if we are able to freakin game plan and show competent match ups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
    • Same thing I first thought but then I saw it was against Jacksonville and took about half a second of playing to know. I was at that game.  I can't tell you my level of excitement when I saw it was Delhomme instead of Peete who came out for the 2nd half. Delhomme has and will probably always be my favorite Panther.
    • We got 4 if you count Jared Allen. It's all an opinion piece and some of you didn't read the parameters under which they chose these players.  Come on, confess.  Who here read the whole article and who just scrolled through and looked at the pictures? 
×
×
  • Create New...