Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More "truth" on Rivera, from this guy @ Sports Media (panthers101.com)


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I came across this "jewel" today by some dude (or gal) named Jesse Collin. Even though it basically is putting more nails in River's coffin---basically beating a dead horse at this point---within my own mind, it may be what I need to keep my sanity, and not let the little embers of optimism that I have about Rivera catch fire and cloud my judgment about him, and  ultimately lead me sheer disappointment (like the last couple of years).

 

Mr. Collin just gave me some much needed clarity. After reading his words, and identifying with his pain, how can I in good conscience believe in optimism in regards to Rivera anymore? Don't get me wrong, I will not scream for Rivera's firing. That's not my style. I won't smile and fist pump when he gets axed, but I will not discourage nor speak against those who do.

 

 

I wanted to believe in Ron Rivera this season.

 

I wanted to believe that all the close losses – a dozen by a touchdown or less – over the 2011 and 2012 seasons were not in vain.

 

I wanted to believe that after starting slow the last two seasons, the Panthers would find a way to start the 2013 season strong.

 

I wanted to believe that with two years of head-coaching experience under his belt, Rivera would learn from past mistakes and elevate the team to the next level.

 

I believe no more.

 

 

 

 

Once again, Rivera chose to put the game on the shoulders of his depleted secondary instead of his 6-foot-5, 250-pound quarterback or 5-foot-9, 245-pound fullback – both short-yardage specialists.

 

Then, in a flash of déjà vu, McDermott dialed up the infamous prevent defense. Needless to say, it failed again.

 

 

 

 

 

When is Rivera going to figure out that "playing not to lose" is dooming the Panthers? 

 

Despite it backfiring repeatedly, he continues to adopt this ultra-conservative, non-aggressive style – on both sides of the ball – when the team has a lead. 

 

There's no killer instinct; no attempt to deliver the knockout punch.

 

 

 

 

It's clear that Rivera is not an NFL-caliber head coach. He's doesn't give the Panthers an edge – like Jim Harbaugh gives the 49ers or Bill Belichick gives the Patriots.

 

In fact, Rivera puts the Panthers at a disadvantage with poor scheming, ineffective in-game adjustments and dreadful game management.

 

 

He lacks a sense of game awareness that all great NFL coaches must have. He doesn't have a feel for momentum and the ebb and flow of the game. Many times, he doesn't even seem to know what the strengths and weaknesses of his own team are.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across this "jewel" today by some dude (or gal) named Jesse Collin. Even though it basically is putting more nails in River's coffin---basically beating a dead horse at this point---within my own mind, it may be what I need to keep my sanity, and not let the little embers of optimism that I have about Rivera catch fire and cloud my judgment about him, and ultimately lead me sheer disappointment (like the last couple of years).

Mr. Collin just gave me some much needed clarity. After reading his words, and identifying with his pain, how can I in good conscience believe in optimism in regards to Rivera anymore? Don't get me wrong, I will not scream for Rivera's firing. That's not my style. I won't smile and fist pump when he gets axed, but I will not discourage nor speak against those who do.

That person repeated everything I and several other posters have said over the past two days. Not a jewel, just the truth about how a fan feels, nothing more.

I'm sure we all feel a lot of the same though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last two plays of the game happened so fast i didn't even think about this. Did we have a timeout left when it was obvious there was a mixup between Moore and Norman on that last play? Someone said in another thread it even looked like Manuel heard it and targeted the reciever immediately. If we did have a timeout left that makes Rivera even more inept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes we had 2 time outs remaining.

If nothing else Rivera should have burned one just to make the Bills call a different play/formation.

Yes, let's call a timeout despite us actually knowing the exact play the Bills are running to try to win the game...lets let them regroup with real time so they can run something we hadnt seen yet.

Rivera lost is that game.

Last play? Norman actually was given a real shot to win it for us. He failed. It was the most ideal scenario Norman could of had. It was basically perfect for him.

But dumb is dumb. Norman blew it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jerry = common denominator on all these poor front office/coaching decisions

 

look for him to replace rivera with another safe, predictable ground-and-pound defensive milquetoast straight out of the 70s football philosophical mentality to give us hope and then spill our collective guts all over a 7-9 record while he profits massively.

 

ugh. *runs off to mail jerry that letter*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, let's call a timeout despite us actually knowing the exact play the Bills are running to try to win the game...lets let them regroup with real time so they can run something we hadnt seen yet.

Rivera lost is that game.

Last play? Norman actually was given a real shot to win it for us. He failed. It was the most ideal scenario Norman could of had. It was basically perfect for him.

But dumb is dumb. Norman blew it

 

Or you can look at it from the other side.

 

Lets call the time out.  Get the guys and the play we want called.  And most importantly with 3 starting DBs in the locker room - MAKE SURE EVERYONE KNOWS THEIR ASSIGNMENT AND LINES UP CORRECTLY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...