Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently, getting beat by the Panthers means you've hit rock bottom

frash.exe

By frash.exe,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000248566/article/new-york-giants-at-rock-bottom-after-loss-to-panthers
 

 

 

Tom Coughlin's team didn't even show up on Sunday, suffering an embarrassing 38-0 loss at the hands of the Carolina Panthers. The 38-point loss is the worst of the Tom Coughlin era. At 0-3, the Giants' playoff hopes are on life support in the third week of September.

 

 

 

Article mostly centered around the Giants' abysmal performance

 

tumblr_lp2v3yp4Zd1r0zbwoo1_400.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
footballisasport Newbie

footballisasport

Posted
Posted

Hmmm... The team was torched 38-0 by a team that has been figuring out a way to lose for the way to long.

 

Believe you me, no one is questioning the Panther's potential. But, many have seen how much this team have been beating themselves instead of beating their opponents. Even the Foxs Analysts today stated that the Panthers should have won the previous two games. Beating the Giants wasn't the shocker. It was the Offense finding their rhythm and beating the Giants 38-0 is where the shocker is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
brandon_87 Newbie

brandon_87

Posted
Posted

Getting destroyed, blown out and shutout by a 0-2 is rock bottom. I don't see that as disrespect, rather the simple truth.

Not giving the Panthers any credit is disrespectful. Eli had thrown for a shite ton of yards, had two very good WR's against a weak secondary. To blame that on simply not showing up is disrespectful.

 

I agree..

 

 

 

now please update your sig, its annoying :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WUnderhill
      Legette for Coleman?

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      That is a big HELL NO. As bad as XL was this season, at least he adds a dimension that the coaches can use for specific plays. Coleman is just as bad, yet adds zero diversity to our receiving corps. I’ll take the guy that at least cares enough to show up to meetings. Getting traded to a new team won’t change either of their work ethics.
    • kungfoodude
      I’m just not impressed with these hires/openings

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think there is any real reason to amend the rule. If you do, the teams will just find a way to abuse it. All the Browns have to do is just interview SOMEONE to "get through" the process. Hell, interview Jim Caldwell if that's what the actual goal is, just to get around it.  Also, they have all of the candidates required for the Rooney Rule in Aden Durde and Nate Scheelhaase. They are in full compliance already. Scheelhaase is already scheduled for a second interview, for that matter.
    • Khyber53
      Don't be greedy.

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I don't know about the stans but he's at times been like 60 percent of the offense on a playoff calibre team. He put up 1202 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns, then had effing 102 receptions for 924 yards and seven receiving touchdowns. He touched the ball 413 times this season (an average of 24 times per game.) Then you have to add in that he's a hell of a blocker when called upon. Without him, the injury depleted 49ers in a hot NFCWest division don't make the playoffs at all.  If that isn't the Most Valuable Player on the team then who should be? The idea that it is an award solely for QBs is just narrow. Edit to add: Will he win it? No. 
×
×
  • Create New...