Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Team Name Here"'s offense didn't show up against the Panthers


CPcavedweller

Recommended Posts

I'm so tired of hearing that someone or something hasn't shown up, and it's constantly chatter about how an offense of some team didn't show up. Whenever that is continuously being mentioned you would think they would notice a trend. That or they believe teams just show up for the lowly Panthers game.

Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the defense is as good as we think/hope it is...even the dumbest of people will notice a trend eventually.

They have certainly shown the ability to be really special. They still need to do it on a consistent basis and when it matters most to get and deserve any accolades. Let's hope that we have seen the first step towards that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have such short term memory. I hear most talk about the Seahawks game and the offense not showing up. Wilson was harassed all day long and we nearly held them without a TD. The Bills game wasn't dominant but without the game winning TD drive it's another tune.

I'm honestly not worried about individual games. The point of this thread is is to say that everytime the Panthers are referred to it's because someone didn't show up. There's a positive correlation between the not showing up line and the performance of the defense. Now that I spelled it out for you all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have such short term memory. I hear most talk about the Seahawks game and the offense not showing up. Wilson was harassed all day long and we nearly held them without a TD. The Bills game wasn't dominant but without the game winning TD drive it's another tune.

I'm honestly not worried about individual games. The point of this thread is is to say that everytime the Panthers are referred to it's because someone didn't show up. There's a positive correlation between the not showing up line and the performance of the defense. Now that I spelled it out for you all.

 

4 losing seasons in a row...  no one gives a poo about respecting losing teams... 

 

 

/spelled out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are all seriously not reading my post. It's not simply from a numbers stand point or boo fuggidy who. It's just that any time, I hear about a supposedly good or should be good team, it's, "oh well they didn't show up at Carolina." I like that fact that two out of our three games have become, "well, against Carolina" kind of games.

I'm just saying there is a correlation now between, "against Carolina, blah bloo blah didn't show up." As opposed to a Jimmy Clausen butt fumble or Jimmy taking the snap and running for a TD for the other team.

A positive correlation meaning, there is a connection between two phenomena that are interconnected. Our defense plays well, the "team name here"s offense didn't show up.

You all either have terrible reading comprehension or just don't read posts and only read the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...