Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason traded?

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

beason lost his leadership role in the defense a long time ago.

 

the defense has taken a life of it's own without him. thank kuechly, hardy, edwards, star..whoever. will they miss him as a friend? yes...but as player, he's been expendable for quite some time. 

 

exactly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

i don't really understand your flip flop on this.

 

you had been screaming about getting out from under Beason. But now you are worried about film study, leadership. The defense has been looking at Keek for a year and a half now. It's keeks team. There are enough smart people in the film room. Blackburn being one of them. He is a really bright guy.

 

the guys will move on.

not a flip flop at all.

 

I want to move on from DeAngelo as well....doesn't mean I blindly endorse them doing so in any manner they choose.  

 

They should of dumped Beason before or after the season.  Doing it now, for basically nothing....IMO messes with chemistry on a journey we already started for 2013.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

Lol Smitty brings up a great point...

 

We are trading Jon Beason for the same compensation that we got Louis Murphy for...

 

Damn.

 

 

You cant lose site of what Beason is today, not what he was.

In 2011, 2012 and 2013 Beason has a total of 26 tackles in the NFL.

His is a position we can easily fill as will be the case with our Running Back corp when they start hitting the streets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

the chemistry so far has little to do with beason.

 

he was limited in the first 2 games, and null in game 3.

 

little with on field chemistry....

 

ask the Bucs if there is more to team chemistry than the starters playing   I'm not comparing us to the Bucs.....just sayin...he was part of what we are.   I would have rather it occured in the off season with a big locker room guy.

 

Now if we practice well today, no rumblings by players, D plays great Sun.....I will be over it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...