Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell has been fined 5 times this year


Floppin

Recommended Posts

Why would Goodell care to target Mike Mitchell?  In the grand scheme of things, he is quite irrelevant.

At least in the case of Suh, he was a highly touted player coming out of college and is talked about in the media a good amount.  Nobody talks about Mitchell.  Mitchell is routinely fined because he plays like a lunatic, which I enjoy, and not because Goodell has a vendetta against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitchell is this years Shockey

 

hate him anywhere else he is, but now that he's on our team, i wouldn't have him play any other way

 

he plays on that very fine line between clean and dirty.  imo he's stayed on the clean side more than not this season, but when you have a reputation, some people can and will only see it and only call out what points back to that reputation.  great play be damned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?  The game has changed tremendously in the last decade.  There's a reason why you're seeing ridiculous passing and receiving stats being put up.  QBs and WRs are becoming virtually untouchable.

 

the game has always evolved. it's not "pussified" it's just different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the game has always evolved. it's not "pussified" it's just different

 

How would you describe it then?

 

If the rules were applied as written, I wouldn't have a problem.  However, that's not what is happening.  If there's a big hit on a QB or WR, flags fly whether the hit was technically legal or not.  Remember Hardy blasting Carson Palmer and getting flagged?  Even Palmer said that hit was perfectly legal.  And every Sunday we see a couple of flags where a DB hits a WR hard in the chest, no contact even close to the head, but flags fly because the pads pop.  That's pussification, not evolution.  The NFL has essentially outlawed big hits, but they can't figure out a way to write that into the rulebook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you describe it then?

 

If the rules were applied as written, I wouldn't have a problem.  However, that's not what is happening.  If there's a big hit on a QB or WR, flags fly whether the hit was technically legal or not.  Remember Hardy blasting Carson Palmer and getting flagged?  Even Palmer said that hit was perfectly legal.  And every Sunday we see a couple of flags where a DB hits a WR hard in the chest, no contact even close to the head, but flags fly because the pads pop.  That's pussification, not evolution.  The NFL has essentially outlawed big hits, but they can't figure out a way to write that into the rulebook. 

 

i would challenge the definition of the word "pussification" so that it does not include due diligence by the league in removing playing style that severely impacts the long-term health of its employees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would challenge the definition of the word "pussification" so that it does not include due diligence by the league in removing playing style that severely impacts the long-term health of its employees

 

If the above statement were applied uniformly to all players on the field, then you might have a point.  I wouldn't agree with it, but you might have one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...