Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to start sunday against Bears


Recommended Posts

Even if they do make the playoffs they will be the #4 seed. Having to play them in the playoffs would be extremely unlikely if we do secure the #2.

 

Ehh Im seriously confident to put money that if the standings stay where they are, N.O will beat Philly. I wont bet much, but I'll still bet it. If they do, we get 4-5 cause it's higher than 6. Packers kinda hot right now, if ARod return to form quickly they can definitely return the favor to SF at Lambeau

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not extremely unlikely at all. If New Orleans gets the 5 seed and has to play in Green Bay they'd probably lose. Green Bay would be the 4 because the NFC east champion will have a better record.

Then if you had San Francisco and Philadelphia in the other game, a win by the 49ers means we are playing GB in the divisional game.

Even if they do make the playoffs they will be the #4 seed. Having to play them in the playoffs would be extremely unlikely if we do secure the #2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard for me to ever pull for the Bears with a certain DE playing for them. The Packers getting in my actually help us in some way if they knock off someone at home. Who knows, but them coming to CLT doesn't scare me. This game is WAY down my priority list this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...