Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prediction: Raiders make a go at Hardy.


Zod

Recommended Posts

I think Hardy is worth more value than people here give him credit for (from what I've read in other threads).  He's a 25 year old DE with a crazy personality coming off a 16 sack season.  

 

Totally warrants a 1st round pick imo and I can also see the Raiders biting.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hardy is worth more value than people here give him credit for (from what I've read in other threads). He's a 25 year old DE with a crazy personality coming off a 16 sack season.

Totally warrants a 1st round pick imo and I can also see the Raiders biting.

Love him, but it's a business and sadly he came up short in our biggest game. Bring him back, trade him, tag him, whatever, but make a good BUSINESS decision GMan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wildcard is that Hardy is not your normal guy.  Who knows if he would even want to play for Oakland given they are going no where and we are in contention for a Superbowl.  I don't think money will be the only factor.  Perhaps a ton of money would or us not seriously trying to sign him.  Still we can sign him if we want to and his cap number won't be that high this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...