Eric Decker Going FA

[heel31ok]

Denver is going to let Decker test free agency. He's definitely not a #1, but would he be a consideration as a #2?

 

I think the Panthers should consider moving LaFell or another WR to the slot and make Ginn the legit #2.

we need to consider moving Steve to the slot . With help on the outside he would wear somebody outand prolong his career.

[B.BERSIN]

fug offseason

[pstall]

http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/282749/report-broncos-to-let-decker-test-fa-market

NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Broncos plan to let Eric Decker test the free agent market in March.

In other words, they won't be re-signing him ahead of March 11. Per RapSheet, the Broncos "view (Decker) as a No. 2," and with both Demaryius and Julius Thomas entering contract years, Denver isn't willing to commit No. 1-receiver money to Decker. The team's "hope" is reportedly that Decker will receive his best offer and give the Broncos a chance to match. Ultimately, we expect Decker to follow the money. He's the top wideout eligible to hit the open market.

There is an excellent play on words in this post.

I bet only panthro or sz get it. Worth a whole pie imo.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[El Chingon]

let the redskins or raiders overpay for him

Exactly. Decker is massively overrated. 

[Rise of The Hive]

No way we can afford him.

[Mr. Scot]

My feelings about Decker are about the same as about Nicks.

If Gettleman thinks he's worth signing, cool. And if not, also fine.

[MHS831]

Points about Decker--Beware any WR whose resume features Manning as his QB--he makes average look good.

Where was he in the Super Bowl?  Seattle's CBs are good tests, and they showed he can be shut down as the #2 with 2 other good WRs on the field.

Decker would be an upgrade over Lafell

 

Maybe this is not the case, but when I hear Gettlemen praising King and McNutt, I tend to think there is a reason.  I think he is telling us that he is not re-signing Lafell and may not be able to re-sign Ginn.  Could he also be telling us that we have the WRs for the bottom of the WR Corps, and since Smitty is so old and small he is not a #1 any longer, so his focus is going to be on bringing in a true #1?

 

Imagine a top WR on the outside (not necessarily a free agent-could be a draft pick), Smith in the slot, and McNutt, King,etc..  Is that enough?  (assuming Ginn gets a deal elsewhere--I personally think we re-sign him)

[Hammerin'Cameron34]

How are your thoughts on Decker and Nicks the same Mr. Scot?

 

Just as easily as Nicks sucked the last two years, and Decker lit it up, the next 2 years Nicks could put up what Decker did the last 2 seasons and Decker could do what Nicks did the last 2 seasons.

[4Corners]

My feelings about Decker are about the same as about Nicks.

If Gettleman thinks he's worth signing, cool. And if not, also fine.

 

Yeah agree w/ this - some team like the Raiders is prob going to throw a shitload of cash at these guys, too. I almost hope that these two guys are out of our price range. Both very talented guys but I don't know if I'd overpay for either one of them. we need more than just a WR and I don't think either one of them are legit #1 wrs. 

[Mr. Scot]

How are your thoughts on Decker and Nicks the same Mr. Scot?

Because I'm not especially excited about either one as an option. If we sign them, fine. If not, fine. I won't scream either way.

I prefer getting receivers via the draft rather than free agency.

[Car123]

I'd rather have Nicks Than Decker. Nicks has proven to be a good #1. Ask any Giants fan, they'll tell you Nicks is better than Cruz.

[Growl]

i dislike virtually all of you so much during the offseason.

[MichaelNewtonII]

sign