Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should I take this job?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

From whispers I heard that I might get a job offer from TWC and it pays almost 22% more than what I'm making now plus it will look really good on my resume and can open new doors for career advancement (with another company of course).  Downside, this job is only good for about a year.  They offer pretty good severance package as well... My wife thinks I should take it but I'm not a risk taker... What say you huddle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think the ultimate question is: do you foresee you sticking with your current job indefinitely? If not, and your goal is achieve this "career advancement" then I would do it.

 

Then again being unemployed sucks ass.

 

There is no movement at my current job... I maxed out my current growth...  One more thing... My wife also works for TWC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would try and figure out where I want to be at the end of this job you are considering taking. Then figure out if there is another way to get to the same point. Sometimes taking the risk scares the crap out of you (been self employed for 10 years now) but you often find out that your mind can make things far worse than they really are. I would say go for it. The only regrets you have are the risks you didn't take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to see red flags too, but a lot of that depends on what they were doing in previous jobs. Certain fields, especially IT, it's easier to track promotions/advancement than in other fields. I'm not going to freak out on someone who went from IT help desk to Network Admin Assistant when changing jobs. Now if it's McD's fry guy to Taco Bell waffle stuffer, that's another thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Comcast is buying them out and going to lay off a lot of employees, you would be a new guy with less experience than others. You could end up jobless, just stick to your job now and wait for a more reliable chance.

 

Odds are that this is an employment contract.  So, the buyout would be irrelevant.  Comcast would have to buy out the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, in the interest of full disclosure, I'm an actor so my entire career is a fugging risk. IOW, take what I'm about to say with a grain of salt.

 

I'd go for it, but I would do so looking at it like this...

 

Can I do the job and do it so well that I'll get recommendations & a resume boost from it?

You've already said yes to the resume, your wife should have/be able to get an idea if your bosses/supervisors are dicks that might try to fug you over on the recommendations if you offend them.

 

Will I like going to work?

It's hard to succeed if you hate your job.

 

Can I learn more about my craft here?

This is simply something I see a lot of people overlook. Put simply, if you aren't learning new things & you're not filthy rich, you are in a dead end job.

 

Last but most important IMO...

I will be making (in your case) 22% more. Unless we are struggling, EVERY FUGGING PENNY of that percentage goes to savings because this job is temporary!

Just do it. Trust me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...