Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting read about trading for Morris Claibourne


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

Link

 

 

The read mentions sending a third for Claibourne. The need for a corner and picking one by the third round might see a drop off in talent. He would be an immediate upgrade, and he doesn't have to be a superstar. I believe he could flourish in this defense, hell I wanted him then. Depending on the cap hit, I bet Dallas would take a fourth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically,  the article suggests that Claiborne's lack of intelligence has contributed to his lack of success.  If our scheme is simple, then maybe.  Do not underestimate the importance of being able to think on the field.  Do not underestimate the ability to watch film critically and study the playbook.  I have never heard of a 4 on the Wonderlic.  He said that he did not finish because it has nothing to do with football.  It was given to him at the combine by the NFL.  I think that has something to do with football.  From that perspective, the broad jump, bench press, and 3 cone drill have nothong to do with football either.

 

In fact, I was looking to find CBs in the draft that may be a little less athletic but make up for it by being cerebral.  One is Russ Cockrell of Duke.  I also like Kenny Ladler (S) of Vandy for the same reason.   They were reportedly good students at very tough schools.  That intelligence seems to have carried over to football.

 

Panther perspectives:  Mike Minter was smart and it carried over.  Eric Davis?  intelligent.  Chris Gamble?  Not intelligent.  Rarely did you ever see Minter or Davis making mental mistakes on the field.  It was more common for Gamble to make them, even though he was (by far) the better athlete.  I think Gamble scored a 9. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like I read somewhere that cornerback was the only position on the field where lower wonderlic scores actually correlated with better performance...just food for thought.

I could see that, honestly. It's probably the most reactionary position in the NFL and if you get caught over-thinking you'll make a mistake.

That's not to say you don't have to know your opponent, route concepts, tendencies, etc, but I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...