Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do you want in 1st?


Ja  Rhule

  

191 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want in first?

    • OL
      93
    • WR
      89
    • Other
      9


Recommended Posts

Amazing how many people want Matthews in the first still lol.

 

I can't find anything not to like.  Elite production in an elite conference with very good measurables to back it up.  Perhaps more importantly, he put up those numbers while the far and away #1 option on his team without an elite QB.  What's your complaints? 

 

Sure, I'd rather have him at #60, but not sure he'll be there.  If we could land him at #60, I'd be doing backflips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dout it. And he will definitely be there in thr second.

Prolly make it to the 3rd like Allen! Much like Allen, everyone shuns him due to not having "monster" upside and awesome combine numbers!

There is still one undeniable truth about Matthews, as was the case with Allen, he produced and produced big time in a system where he was the only threat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelvin Benjamim

Morgan Moses

JaWuan James

Kyle Fuller

Ryan Shazier

I'd be ok with any of them at #28

I want no part of Kouandjio and find Jordan Matthews underwhelming.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...