Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

The neighbors call to 911 is not consistent with with the injuries. If Hardy was beating on you, you would have more than scratches and bruises. If she looked so bad why would the police not have arrested him on the spot? Why would she not been sent to the hospital?

 

Hardy did the right thing by calling 911. This girl was probably drunk and or coked up. She was pissed and embellished the story  even further .

 

The lesson for Greg is to stay away from crazy bitches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The neighbor isnt the one who called claiming to have seen/ heard a woman getting beaten.

That person was yelling in the background of the door man's call and claimed to have been in the condo. The door man said he had never seen that woman before.

I dont believe there is any account from the nrighbor that is public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the call, it seems like there was someone trying to hold his girlfriend back. Shouldn't this person corroborate Hardy's telling of the event? Where are Hardy's witnesses?

They will when it goes to trial. If it goes to trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not Hardy is in fact guilty or innocent, the damage to his reputation and person has been done.  All one has to do is look up Greg Hardy and there are numerous news stories that have already cast him as the guilty "big, bad football player" who beat up his little girlfriend.  That's what is currently in the internet due to the current documents.

 

On the flip side, until there is a well defined timeline and sequence of events, all we have is people making things up based on extremely limited information.  There are so many blank areas in this situation which need detail, it's really hard to make any kind of informed judgement.

 

On my fan bias, I want Hardy to be innocent of hurting someone.  I want him playing for us being only guilty of doing something stupid which injured his person/reputation and he caused no one any physical injuries.  I'm fine with the AA meetings or any other kind of counseling because he's got to understand the consequences of his actions beyond the millions this will cost him. 

 

On my personal bias, I want the truth to come out, all of it.  Were they all doing drugs that night?  Was he sleeping with multiple women?  Does he really own 25-30 guns and keep them loaded?  When did everything go down (I'm big on the timeline thing...)?  As a human being, there is so much murk in the water it's extremely difficult to know if I should want to punch Hardy out for laying his hands on a woman in that way or reinforce the simple idea of being careful with the situations you put yourself.

 

Regardless, Hardy DFU'd (Dun F_____ Up).  Either he's guilty of beating up his girlfriend, which he should never do, or he's guilty of being a dumb young dude with money and power.  It's going to be very interesting to see if this goes to court or not.  If it doesn't, then this will cloud the rest of Hardy's career, and might very well end it with the Panthers either way.  If he laid a single hand on her in anything but gentle self defense, he's done with the Panthers.  No matter the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt read all 200 posts, but I read some of you sounding relieved, as if the girl was the problem.  While that could turn out to be true, Just because Hardy called 911 and told his side of the story to the dispatcher, do not think that is evidence of innocence.  It sounds convincing and is good news from that perspective, but the judge saw the bruises and marks on her body.  The judge felt that the female was the victim.  The legal expert who felt that the girl had been assaulted will not be a petty detail that can easily be overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...