Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

voth on OTA tweeting ban

nosuchthingasapanther

Recommended Posts

nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

Bill Voth ‏@billvoth · 12m

Loved that the #Panthers shut down tweeting during OTAs. Wish they could do same for camp. So little relevance in the play-by-play.

Bill Voth ‏@billvoth · 4m

how many p-b-p tweets at camp matter in season? 25%? vs backups, even drills between 1s need grain of salt RT @TimmyB_23 @billvoth elaborate

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted

We need reporters. We need them to condense what happens into manageable articles so that reporters still have jobs for years to come. God bless reporters.

I understand what you are saying and completely understand however I have two issues.

1. I like the fact that we can get up to the second info so everything can be blow completely out of proportion.

2. JP is a "reporter".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

Personally I liked it. Trying to watch, take photos, and tweet sucks.

Sent from the Carolina Huddle App

Dayton probably saw you trying to multitask and do all that poo at the same time and labeled you a spy, thus the tweet ban. Thanks a lot Zod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...