Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FO: Panthers most likely candidate for First to Worst


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

1. Carolina Panthers, 30.0 percent
 
Carolina's likelihood of collapse starts with one of the strongest elements of forecasting in the NFL: Offense is more consistent from year to year than defense. That means a defense-first team such as Carolina is going to have a harder time repeating as division champion than an offense-first team such as Denver. Inconsistency is a bigger issue for the Carolina defense because three-fourths of its starting secondary from 2013 is gone in free agency.
 
There's even more turnover on offense, and it's not exactly a good thing. Left tackle Jordan Gross retired with no clear replacement on the roster. The team turned over almost its entire wide receiver corps and is now depending on a 32-year-old vet coming off a fluke year (Jerricho Cotchery), a rookie who was widely regarded as a talented longer-term project (Kelvin Benjamin) and a serviceable slot receiver who would never scare anyone on the outside (Jason Avant). To top it all off, we rank the Panthers eighth in projected schedule strength, the toughest schedule of any of last year's division champions.

 

 

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11309846/carolina-panthers-most-likely-team-go-first-worst-2014-nfl

 

Rest of the list:

 

2. Indianapolis Colts, 17.9 percent
3. Cincinnati Bengals, 17.0 percent
4. Philadelphia Eagles, 12.4 percent
5. Green Bay Packers, 8.7 percent
6. New England Patriots, 8.2 percent
7. Seattle Seahawks, 8.1 percent
8. Denver Broncos, 2.3 percent

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

over almost its entire wide receiver corps and is now depending on a 32-year-old vet coming off a fluke year (Jerricho Cotchery), a rookie who was widely regarded as a talented longer-term project (Kelvin Benjamin) and a serviceable slot receiver who would never scare anyone on the outside (Jason Avant). 

 

Wow, my head hurts.  I need a beer.  A fluke year?  WTF?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, the basement in our division will be what? 7-9 or 6-10? The worst in the afc south will probably have 3 or 4 wins, which would be a shocking drop by the colts.

 

Yep. It's a combination of the relative strength of our division plus our "question marks" (which honestly I only think the stability of the offensive line is a question mark, but we all know what the media thinks). They even mention the AFC South's shittiness:

 

Plus, in the AFC South more than any other division, the chances of a team going 6-10 or worse aren't really the same as its chances of finishing in last place. The last-place team in this division will almost assuredly be 4-12 or worse, and it's hard to imagine the Colts being that team if Luck is healthy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...