Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There is one player I wish we had from KC


BigBoss

Recommended Posts

I'm actually a big KC fan also and love a lot of the players they have on defense (Poe, Johnson, Berry). But if I could only take one player and add him, besides berry??

 

 

De'anthony Thomas. Good grief that boy has some speed huh? How nice would it be to have him returning our punts AND kickoffs?

 

 

 

Not too much speed for Brandon Williams tho I will add :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Thomas...i was hoping Barner was a slower version of him but DeAnthony is special.

Amazing how much vile i got from Huddlers saying "we got Barner!!" when I suggested he would be an excellent mid late pick. I think mocks had him in the 5th/6th which is really low for a guy with his speed and hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you banned everyone you disagreed with or everyone that posted content that went against traditional thinking, who would be left?

 

It has nothing to do with that. This really isn't Panthers related. If it were, then people could post topics like "I wish we had Calvin Johnson" "Imagine how good we'd be with Darrelle Revis" "Cam could stay healthy if we had this one player from the Browns (Joe Thomas)." Not Panthers related = ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
    • Got home in time to see Halls goal in the 3rd. Saw replays of Staal and LeCuck dropping gloves on the faceoff loved that! Playoff Freddie entered the building  woo! Hope to see the full replay on Fandual.
×
×
  • Create New...