Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible DE Trade?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Some of you still are not getting that last year we were a defensive powerhouse with 5 defensive ends. Now we have 6 and pressing needs elsewhere.

I'm not so sure some of you realize there is a 53 player limit.

Sent from my SM-N900P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Don't you know everybody wants everyone on the team! Reality has no place in the Huddle! Lol

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosh, this is like a few years ago when everyone wanted to keep and pay all the RB's.

 

Bottom like is, Zod is correct.

 

You have more DE's than will make the roster.

 

You can choose, get a quality OT and give the offense a chance to stay on the field, OR, keep all the DEs and rotate them......a lot.  Because they will be on the field forever.  3 and outs on our offense are going to be common place because of our OT's in my opinion.  One great veteran guy will help a great deal.

 

And further, i would trade Charles Johnson.  He is good enough to warrant a starting tackle and we can move some salary.  Win win

 

Trading Johnson would be my choice.  But i would want Hardy signed long term before doing it.  That way Hardy wont have ther leverage. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much about NFL trades and values and such, but would a team be willing to trade for a guy who has a high chance of being cut regardless? Especially when other ends will end up being made available around the league as well?

 

If the waiver wire is like other sports where last years record determines who gets first dibs on waiver pick ups.  And a DE could mean the difference between being mediocre and making the playoffs. 

 

You make that trade because

 

1. you have to be to 53 as well and if you have something we need you gain as well.

 

2. The last thing you want to see is your rival or someone else steal the player you needed to get you one step closer to your goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if there is an OT worth trading for, that is available, then yes, ya get him.

I doubt that it would be a player for player trade

If were goung to cut a DE anyways, then you shop him around as teams do.

With cuts happenung soon, there isn't much incentive for teams to do so..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you still are not getting that last year we were a defensive powerhouse with 5 defensive ends. Now we have 6 and pressing needs elsewhere.

I'm not so sure some of you realize there is a 53 player limit.

Sent from my SM-N900P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Logic is a dangerous thing.

I would guess that some of the same people that want us to keep 6 DEs also want us to keep 3 QBs and 6 receivers and .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how the NFL edict to get tougher on pass interference and illegal contact will have on teams that can't put pressure on the QB. It's a perfect storm for us. We are built to pressure the QB. I think it's going to get ridiculous how often flags fly when plays are extended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the waiver wire is like other sports where last years record determines who gets first dibs on waiver pick ups.  And a DE could mean the difference between being mediocre and making the playoffs. 

 

You make that trade because

 

1. you have to be to 53 as well and if you have something we need you gain as well.

 

2. The last thing you want to see is your rival or someone else steal the player you needed to get you one step closer to your goal.

 

Totally didn't consider the waiver wire. Makes sense now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...