Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I contended Deangelo is the 3rd best RB on the team


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Two things. First, DWill has had a bunch of productive runs up the middle. Not every fuging play is a dud. He is probably still faster than Stewy. But, Stewy is a bigger back. Use them correctly, and they can still compliment each of pretty damm well.

Second. Rarely see CRA around. Throw out a bash DWill thread, and the dude is all over it. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not like him in a good way or bad?

There not in the mold of Stewart or Tolbert

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

You asked why we were drafting RBs in the mold of DWill. Those guys are nothing like DWill. It's not a good or bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things. First, DWill has had a bunch of productive runs up the middle. Not every fuging play is a dud. He is probably still faster than Stewy. But, Stewy is a bigger back. Use them correctly, and they can still compliment each of pretty damm well.

Second. Rarely see CRA around. Throw out a bash DWill thread, and the dude is all over it. lol

90% of his up the middle runs are duds now. This is reality. I'm with CRA on this one. We don't have the oline for dwills type of running on a consistent basis. I love dwill as a person and player but he's not a #1 for this type of team we have.

This isn't a hate fest for me. This is just what I've seen. Most people here who have been against dwill starting actually really like the dude.

The rb starting is going to have to shake off d lineman. It's the reality of our run blocking being what it is. Dwill in this stage of his career isn't cutting it. We need to design plays to take advantage of his abilities but those are not on standard running plays that we have now. Sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

90% of his up the middle runs are duds now. This is reality. I'm with CRA on this one. We don't have the oline for dwills type of running on a consistent basis. I love dwill as a person and player but he's not a #1 for this type of team we have.

This isn't a hate fest for me. This is just what I've seen. Most people here who have been against dwill starting actually really like the dude.

The rb starting is going to have to shake off d lineman. It's the reality of our run blocking being what it is. Dwill in this stage of his career isn't cutting it. We need to design plays to take advantage of his abilities but those are not on standard running plays that we have now. Sorry

So, is there a rule against using miss-direction? Or running off tackle? Or even starting from under center instead of in the shot-gun? Play action can be a useful tool. Screen passes work well, when they actually use them.

Folks just zero in on the negative, and have tunnel vision with the positive. Heaven forbid a RB get stuffed. Folks love it when our D stuffs a RB, but hate it when it our RB that gets stuffed.

IF used correctly. DWill and Stewy can still compliment each other very well. But hellz, that won't fly here on the Huddle where negativity and hyperbole rule.

Another thing. Get Turner back, and those dive plays just might be effective. I can say might be. Most folks just say won't be. See the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, is there a rule against using miss-direction? Or running off tackle? Or even starting from under center instead of in the shot-gun? Play action can be a useful tool. Screen passes work well, when they actually use them.

Folks just zero in on the negative, and have tunnel vision with the positive. Heaven forbid a RB get stuffed. Folks love it when our D stuffs a RB, but hate it when it our RB that gets stuffed.

IF used correctly. DWill and Stewy can still compliment each other very well. But hellz, that won't fly here on the Huddle where negativity and hyperbole rule.

Another thing. Get Turner back, and those dive plays just might be effective. I can say might be. Most folks just say won't be. See the difference?

You bring up a really good question. Why do we not use more screen plays? I mean, sure, we use them, but not to a degree of other teams, and especially since our running game is suffering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught a little flack from it from JJ and Sammi on the podcast for saying it.

Am I wrong?

Sent from Carolina Huddle App for Android.

stew > dwill

tolbert > dwill

both are more consistent at moving forward.

both are stronger.

both are better blockers.

both are more reliable in the pasing game.

both are better in short yardage /end zone situations.

tolbert is the most durable of the three and that makes him the most valuable of the three.

the biggest issue is fit. we have more of a power based run game. cam adds the finess, but our running attacks have tended to be more between the tackles stuff and less dancing. barner just didn't fit at all. dwill has/had some power, but that was never his forte like it is with stewart and tolbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, is there a rule against using miss-direction? Or running off tackle? Or even starting from under center instead of in the shot-gun? Play action can be a useful tool. Screen passes work well, when they actually use them.

Folks just zero in on the negative, and have tunnel vision with the positive. Heaven forbid a RB get stuffed. Folks love it when our D stuffs a RB, but hate it when it our RB that gets stuffed.

IF used correctly. DWill and Stewy can still compliment each other very well. But hellz, that won't fly here on the Huddle where negativity and hyperbole rule.

Another thing. Get Turner back, and those dive plays just might be effective. I can say might be. Most folks just say won't be. See the difference?

The oline is what it is. Turner may help but he's just a rook . I'm hoping for the best.

We will see how this progresses as the season begins. This isn't being negative this is just reality. This is what we have on oline. Who gives is the best shot with this oline? Stew and Tolbert because of their running styles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That odd ball Saints game at the end of the 2012 season made people forget how average Williams was that entire season....and why he was officially benched for 28 early on

 

 

that was against the worst defense in the league. don't get me wrong, 210 yards is definitely an accomplishment...but that one game inflated his overall performance for the season.

 

 

That was statistically the worst defense ever.

 

 

so there's your ultimate answer as to when was the last time D-Will killed it against somebody good, awhile ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the 6 years Stew and DWill have been together:

Stew has averaged 5 plus yards per carry 2 times.

Dwill has averaged 5 plus yards per carry 3 times.

Stewart has averaged just 3.7 yards per carry the last 2 years.

DWill has never averaged less than 4 plus yards per carry.

 

Tolbert by the way in 2 years in Carolina averages 3.5 yards per carry.

 

Big picture all thing being equal.

 

A lot of Tolberts duties here have been in short yardage and even goal to go situations where the defense KNOWS for a fact we are running the ball and stack accordingly.

 

He almost always falls forward and if he was given regular touches instead of "we know you are running it with Tolbert" plays his YPC would no doubt be higher. As a matter of fact his 3.5 YPC is very impressive considering when/where he gets the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things. First, DWill has had a bunch of productive runs up the middle. Not every fuging play is a dud. He is probably still faster than Stewy. But, Stewy is a bigger back. Use them correctly, and they can still compliment each of pretty damm well.Second. Rarely see CRA around. Throw out a bash DWill thread, and the dude is all over it. lol

I'm always around in football season...

As for the Williams bashing, it isnt bashing. People just consistantly get butthurt about one of the most fan friendly and nicest players in our franchise history.

One day Luke Kuechly won't be the best option at LB. It happens to everyone. Plus, like I have always said, scheme has been the biggest issue for Williams since Fox left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think CRA has clouded a lot of posters judgements about the rb situation. He is to the point too much instead of giving dwill his proper due.

Dwill still has it, but only in certain scenarios or plays.

Stew gives us the best chance this year if he remains healthy and I stand by that conviction. Just because of his style that meshes with our oline.

Ryan kalil said as much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of Tolberts duties here have been in short yardage and even goal to go situations where the defense KNOWS for a fact we are running the ball and stack accordingly.

 

He almost always falls forward and if he was given regular touches instead of "we know you are running it with Tolbert" plays his YPC would no doubt be higher. As a matter of fact his 3.5 YPC is very impressive considering when/where he gets the ball.

 

No doubt that figures in, the year he took over for an injured RB in San Diego and the year after that he had 300 plus carries averaging 4.0 YPC, so sightly better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...