Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Godfrey back to S? Per BBR


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

They act like Harper was playing in back of the Falcons front 7. For some strange reason.

Who knows what Harper is or isn't....

Saints run an aggressive scheme which can put secondary players in bad spots. We can run rush 4....and put average guys in great spots in they simply don't do dumb things. Harper could get the job done.....saying that isn't claiming he is good at this stage. Just that collectively it might get us through this season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows what Harper is or isn't....

Saints run an aggressive scheme which can put secondary players in bad spots. We can run rush 4....and put average guys in great spots in they simply don't do dumb things. Harper could get the job done.....saying that isn't claiming he is good at this stage. Just that collectively it might get us through this season

yet I'm exaggerating ss wasn't a td machine and shouldn't be at 5'9 with cam Tolbert and Olsen his job was to loosen up the d so our other wr could make plays, you also fail to mention the two games he missed......that not lafell production, lafell production is not being consistent and not stepping up when his number was called but the steve smith thig is another debate.....Godfrey is a guy who knows the system I have more faith in him the Harper who's not hit the field yet

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yet I'm exaggerating ss wasn't a td machine and shouldn't be at 5'9 with cam Tolbert and Olsen his job was to loosen up the d so our other wr could make plays, you also fail to mention the two games he missed......that not lafell production, lafell production is not being consistent and not stepping up when his number was called but the steve smith thig is another debate.....Godfrey is a guy who knows the system I have more faith in him the Harper who's not hit the field yet

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

89 was 5th on the team in YAC. he wasn't loosening up defenses. 89 simply wasn't 89 anymore last year. He shouldn't be......and realizing that isn't negative.

Maybe if Godfrey wasn't coming off an ACL and looked even like his old self....I'd buy him over Harper. Until Harper steps on the field and flops I say he should get the shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who knows what Harper is or isn't....

Saints run an aggressive scheme which can put secondary players in bad spots. We can run rush 4....and put average guys in great spots in they simply don't do dumb things. Harper could get the job done.....saying that isn't claiming he is good at this stage. Just that collectively it might get us through this season

I know. I've seen a team I cheer for attack him and scheme against him for 6 or 7 years now. I know he is a weak link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

89 was 5th on the team in YAC. he wasn't loosening up defenses. 89 simply wasn't 89 anymore last year. He shouldn't be......and realizing that isn't negative.

Maybe if Godfrey wasn't coming off an ACL and looked even like his old self....I'd buy him over Harper. Until Harper steps on the field and flops I say he should get the shot

Even coming off a Achilles injury he's faster then slow ass Harper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be the easiest reason to do this. He's better then the garbage we have been watching.

 

 

Thank goodness. The Russell and Lester show was getting unwatchable.

 

Lester has been pitiful.  He does not deserve a spot on this team.  Several, including myself, were hoping he would develop into a nice player.  Buy after the SF playoff loss and now this preseason, he should be gone.  He is nothing but a liability.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...