Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Us sucking D on Defense, is it the coaches or the talent?


Recommended Posts

I don't know how our defense fell apart this quickly, we were very solid last year and now we made the guy who won the get to be a Bengal for a day contest have an excellent game in place of AJ Green.

 

So who's to blame? The lack of talent and filling the defense with scrubs and rejects, or the coaches for not adapting?

With that said, bring Hardy's ass back after the Green Bay game, he'll have served his six games by then. (I know this won't happen because JR has to have his team take a hit in order to help goodell's incompetent ass with PR, but it would be nice)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of talent. This is the same scheme that had us the second best defense in the league last year. The main difference that I see is the lack of aggression at the point of attack. If it's not Luke or Davis trying to make the tackle it appears weak in the secondary.

The safeties are atrocious. Harper is terrible. I honestly think the only reason he's playing over Lester is because he plays so deep that he won't give up the deep play. Staff must think Lester's a liability there.

Last year Mitchell flew all over the place...the guy had some dumb penalties but he would lay the wood and had good hands. There is no intimidator there anymore. People aren't scared to go over the middle if they stay away from Keuchly and Davis.

You can't discount the lack of pass rush off that right side. Teams are basically singling up every DL and daring CJ to beat them if he can get there in the time of a 3-5 step drop. This works because our DBs suck and the OCs of the other team basically believe that there will always be a receiver open if they can get the ball to the perimeter. It's pretty pathetic. We can't man up bc they suck...we can't zone bc we can't get an adequate rush without a DB breakdown first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not having Hardy allows the opposing offensive line to no longer double team somebody. Without pressure, they can send somebody right at Luke/a LB and open running lanes. Without pressure on the QB, our CBs are too average and safeties too shitty to cover/catch up to anyone. 

 

If we get to the QB, we're still fine. Problem is, we haven't been consistently doing so. And I don't have faith in us to get back to doing so this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...