Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Boston should be starting over Harper.

 

 

"watching harper tackle is like streaming 1080p hd on 3mbps internet connection... one second it looks like it will work, then it freezes, then the video jumps ahead and the player is out of sync, it then clears up to see the td celebration. smh"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came in at the very end for like 5 plays or so. He made one tackle but the play was called back for holding. I think we need to let him get some time at SS, as roman is sucking.

roman has 3 intos just picture how much boston would have , bostons way better, I thought harper was gunna play agressive like mitchell did but I was wrong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

 

I can't agree more with this.

 

The line isn't a strength this year. We're not going to generate consistent pressure with a standard rush. We're already getting waxed by double digits and allowing NBA style points per game. Mix it up and blitz a lot more, throw out some of the younger guys and try to inject some speed. What's the worst that can happen? We allow 35+ and lose by 20?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to insert these young dudes. Norman too.

But we also need to get away from the 2013 blueprint and realize all it does is get us beat. We need to gamble and blitz. Try to help the secondary out. Yes, blitzing puts more on their shoulders but if we get their it gives them a chance to make plays. The 2013 model just leaves them hanging anyway to get torched

 

 

I agree! The pass rush is nowhere like it was last season so we need to adjust. I am very disappointed in our safety play. Harper is just too slow. I wouldn't mind those positions to be shaken up. I am not sure how good Tre Boston is but at this point, I'm ready to see a change back there. Also with Godfrey, he is just not suited as a cornerback. He doesn't have that quickness that is needed. Honestly, put him back at safety or something. Anyway, what do I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...