Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Requirement to be a top-tier QB


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

Have some help around you.

This is Gregg Rosenthal's comment regarding Andrew Luck in his QB Index:

"But recognition as a true top-tier quarterback will arrive this year because he's getting more support."

This is not an Andrew Luck thread. Luck is a really good QB. Pretend this isn't about him, but about Quarterbacks in general.

I can't shake the fact I am seeing/hearing comments like this. Can you not be considered a top-tier QB without being surrounded by weapons? If you need weapons to be top-tier......wouldn't that suggest you were not top-tier??? So the question I am asking is:

What do you believe should qualify you as a top-tier QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wins and Sb's

That's all ppl remember

And that's why people are stupid. There is no "requirement" for it, you just gotta watch them play and you can tell who's elite and who's not. Pin-point accuracy, pocket awareness, perfect decision making, touch on the ball, deep ball ability, etc. The QBs that can take over a game and not make huge mistakes are elite and there's only 4 of them right now. Rivers and Romo are close but not quite there. I'd have those two in the 2nd tier by themselves right now then after that Ben, Eli, Wilson, Cam, Luck, etc in no order.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

production. move the ball and get the ball into the endzone. do your part. the bigger the part you play, the better you are. that's essentially it for me. everything else is just noise.

and QBs don't win or lose games. they may have big plays that help one way or the other, but a game isn't won on one or two big plays. it's a team effort that takes three phases and about 32 other players to pull off. all you can do is do your part and hope that the other contributors do their part or at least don't screw up bad enough to keep you from winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...