Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the difference between Bersin, Coctchrey, and Avant?


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

We have all three active because they are the three best options to have active after KB. I do agree that we need speed because I think we probably have the slowest WR corps in the NFL, but we can't just put a random fast guy out there simply because he's fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brenston looked pretty quick on his long Kick Return. I was kinda amazed that he looked so fast. To me, he looks to be the best bet for return duties we have. Outside that one muff that is. Other than that, he has looked pretty solid. Oh, and that one fair catch where no one was around him. He looked around like someone told him to fair catch it. So...other than the muff, and fair catch, yeah, I like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Insert steven hill. Let avant or cotchery walk elevate bersin.

Perfect! ! Keep Cotch let Avant walk and elevate Bersin. Then use Hill on 4 or 5 plays a game on the 9 route. Even as a decoy he'll draw some attention with his speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have all three active because they are the three best options to have active after KB. I do agree that we need speed because I think we probably have the slowest WR corps in the NFL, but we can't just put a random fast guy out there simply because he's fast.

Teams are not afriad of any deep plays so they will bottle up every thing short. Right now teams can double team KB and Olsen and say fug the other guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
    • oh now that's what you call Mother Fiuggure fans the ones that always have this fierce protective shield around the team no matter if they win or lose  & to be honest there is nothing really wrong with being a Mother Fiugguer fan they just have a different meaning or sense of what a true fan really is                                                 ☺️ 
×
×
  • Create New...