Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk Kelvin Benjamin


CelibatePimp

Recommended Posts

What is really going on? If we want a WR who can only body-catch balls, we might as well put Presley or Hill in there, at least they have speed.

 

I am really getting worried, because we most likely may not have Brown next week and can't afford to not have any reliable targets for Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is really going on? If we want a WR who can only body-catch balls, we might as well put Presley or Hill in there, at least they have speed.

 

I am really getting worried, because we most likely may not have Brown next week and can't afford to not have any reliable targets for Newton.

 

He came out on fire. Against arguably THE BEST CB in the league.  He also drew many illegal contact fouls. 

He only had one actual bad drop.  Other than that a good performance (when thrown to at least.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said the other day...

 

Its a long season for a rookie.

 

Let KB have a couple of seasons before we try to judge him.  He is going to struggle throughout this postseason because he has never had to be mentally tough this long.  

 

 

#NotTheEndOfTheWorld

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ball was slick today for him to perform his acrobatic catches.... Cam threw behind him a couple times

 

Yeah, I can get with the slick ball had he not had these issues previously, also, other WR made plays. Hopefully it's the pressure that got to him more than anything. We need him going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came out on fire. Against arguably THE BEST CB in the league.  He also drew many illegal contact fouls. 

He only had one actual bad drop.  Other than that a good performance (when thrown to at least.)

 

All his catches were body catches. On plays where he had to use his hands, he could not bring the ball in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...