Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who thinks we'll actually beat Seattle on Saturday?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

What's your gameplan to victory? Any reasons besides how "we're due" or "we're a team of destiny" or "I have a feeling"?

 

I think we lose 31-13, similar to the Sunday Night Football game in New Orleans last year. We've improved and we've had a successful season where I can see us making a Super Bowl run next year, but at the end of the day, we still have Byron Bell at LT and presumably Brenton Bersin at punt returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hope...using logical arguments with that hope....we're going to have to do what we haven't all year and not have any turnovers on offense, no lapses on ST, and no big plays given up on defense.  That hasn't happened in a single game yet, so the only thing to say for that is maybe this is the game, finally.  Maybe all the wheels finally click and we go over the hump.

 

I have hope, but logically, we're going to have to fire on absolutely every cylinder and if we do win, I worry this'll be like the Chicago game in 05 where we expend so much energy and get beaten up so much we won't have anything left for the next round.

 

But we're in, and until we're out, we have a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said 17-13. And I don't know who scores either. I'm thinking we go up 7-0 early in the game as usual, Seattle goes down and kicks a FG, we punt, they punt, we punt, they punt, we punt, they fumble, we score a TD, then Bersin fumbles, They score a TD, then Cam fumbles, they kick a FG, we run the clock down and kick a FG with 16 seconds left and win.

 

Or none of that happens and Seattle scores 17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the record shows it will be a low scoring ball game.  I don't expect them to come close

to 30 points.

 

Our last three games against them we've lost by 4 or 5 points...we can beat them and we're due.

 

Two things....we could have beat San Fran last year but we made dumb mistakes and penalties.

 

We beat Arizona but made dumb mistakes and Cam didn't have a good game.

 

If Cam plays well, we have more than a chance.  I was hoping for a little less sloppy game Saturday,

meaning we learned our lesson from last year.  I'm 50/50 right now, but I certainly think we can beat them, even on the road..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in a post earlier. We will have to play the most consistent football we've ever played. We have to catch every ball, throw it accurately. Defensively we need to play as sound/disciplined as we've played all year.

 

I think we can, but the stars would need to be aligned. I don't want to make predictions, but I would say if we play our best game we can win....... I think we have about a 30% chance of that happening. Just not enough speed to get it done on offense, while at the same time, holding them to a lower point total. Similar to all the other games we've played against them, similar outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...