Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Senior Bowl Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Anyone going to be watching?

 

 

Last year, the Panthers didn't draft anyone from the Senior Bowl and had arguably their best draft ever overall.

 

The year before, they got KK Short and Kenjon Barner. So Gettleman does have a history of drafting from the Senior Bowl, although results have been a mixed bag.

 

Good quote from Gettleman from Panthers.com on the 2015 draft class overall...

 

"We had meetings (with our college scouts) back in December, and it is going to be strong at wide receiver again," Gettleman said. "It looks like it is going to be strong at offensive tackle again. I feel like there is going to be some depth at defensive end and pass rushers – you know how I feel about pass rushers."

 

WR - OT - DE

 

Gettleman dropping info on what he is really after or .... smokescreen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many more talented seniors this year, than in year's past.  I will certainly be watching and looking at a ton of players for Carolina.

 

North:  

 

Crowder

Montgomery

Devin Smith

Drummond

Abdullah

Langford

Cobb

Clemmings

Mayle

Hardy 

Lippett

Orchard

 

South:

 

Tartt

David Johnson

Lockett

Prewitt

Geathers

Artis-Payne

Sambrailo

Collins

Flowers (DE)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to snag Justin Hardy in the mid-rounds.

 

 

He would immediately be our best return option and probably could develop into a solid WR2-3.

 

He would definitely be an improvement to our return game. It's going to be interesting to see him running NFL-style routes. Most of his catches were short to intermediate routes designed to quickly get him the ball in space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...