Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Voth changed his opinion of Hardy's future?


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

Lack of trust by "Richardson and others in the building" (probably Gettleman) would be the reason.

Trust can be attained if Greg is willing to play for below his market value on a prove it deal.. Gettlemen nor Jerry aren't dumb.. if they can get a top 5 pass rushers on a below market prove it deal they will..

Don't act like Jerry hasn't made a business decision before. . Smitty got away with worse and still got paid by Jerry..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And exactly what bullshit are you referring to? All I am doing is not buying nothing as something? You know...pretty much not buying into the bullshit.

For example, you claim the majority of the team is lobbying for him to come back. Voth's piece doesn't claim that. It doesn't even name one person. It suggest at least one team leader may have said something....but even that could be hearsay Voth is running with for what if fun piece.

Hardy is done. That ain't bullshit

 

you two gonna screw, aren't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick point to the folks who think the Ray Rice decision will help Hardy...

 

Ray Rice filed his court case based on the fact that he had already been suspended without pay once for the same incident.  The NFL was embarrassed when the video came out so they claimed not to know how serious the incident had actually been and suspended Rice indefinitely on the basis of this and the claim that he had lied to them.

 

The judge who heard the case found the NFL's claim that they "didn't know what really happened the first time" to be bulls--t, and vacated the suspension based on that belief.

 

None of that applies to Hardy.

 

Hardy can't claim to be suspended again for the same offense because 1) he got his full paycheck and 2) because he voluntarily agreed to go on the Exempt List.

 

And if you're counting on the NFLPA, remember that Adrian Peterson already appealed his suspension based on the whole 'double jeopardy / rules change' notion, and lost.  Peterson is a way bigger star in the league.  If the Players Association couldn't save him, what makes you think they can save Hardy?

 

Bottom Line: The NFL could indeed ultimately decide not to suspend Hardy, but the more info I see the less chance I see of that happening.

 

And if they do ultimately suspend him for two, four, six, eight games or such, I think you can pretty well count on it sticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick point to the folks who think the Ray Rice decision will help Hardy...

 

Ray Rice filed his court case based on the fact that he had already been suspended without pay once for the same incident.  The NFL was embarrassed when the video came out so they claimed not to know how serious the incident had actually been and suspended Rice indefinitely on the basis of this and the claim that he had lied to them.

 

The judge who heard the case found the NFL's claim that they "didn't know what really happened the first time" to be bulls--t, and vacated the suspension based on that belief.

 

None of that applies to Hardy.

 

Hardy can't claim to be suspended again for the same offense because 1) he got his full paycheck and 2) because he voluntarily agreed to go on the Exempt List.

 

And if you're counting on the NFLPA, remember that Adrian Peterson already appealed his suspension based on the whole 'double jeopardy / rules change' notion, and lost.  Peterson is a way bigger star in the league.  If the Players Association couldn't save him, what makes you think they can save Hardy?

 

Bottom Line: The NFL could indeed ultimately decide not to suspend Hardy, but the more info I see the less chance I see of that happening.

 

And if they do ultimately suspend him for two, four, six, eight games or such, I think you can pretty well count on it sticking.

 

Do you really not see the obvious differences between Peterson's situation versus that of Hardy? One guy admitted and was indicted for felony child abuse. The other was facing misdemeanor charges in a case that ended up being dismissed altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick point to the folks who think the Ray Rice decision will help Hardy...

Ray Rice filed his court case based on the fact that he had already been suspended without pay once for the same incident. The NFL was embarrassed when the video came out so they claimed not to know how serious the incident had actually been and suspended Rice indefinitely on the basis of this and the claim that he had lied to them.

The judge who heard the case found the NFL's claim that they "didn't know what really happened the first time" to be bulls--t, and vacated the suspension based on that belief.

None of that applies to Hardy.

Hardy can't claim to be suspended again for the same offense because 1) he got his full paycheck and 2) because he voluntarily agreed to go on the Exempt List.

And if you're counting on the NFLPA, remember that Adrian Peterson already appealed his suspension based on the whole 'double jeopardy / rules change' notion, and lost. Peterson is a way bigger star in the league. If the Players Association couldn't save him, what makes you think they can save Hardy?

Bottom Line: The NFL could indeed ultimately decide not to suspend Hardy, but the more info I see the less chance I see of that happening.

And if they do ultimately suspend him for two, four, six, eight games or such, I think you can pretty well count on it sticking.

The part that would apply to Hardy would be the judge saying Goodell didn't have authority to suspending him longer than policy dictated at the time of the offense.

Meaning 2 games and not minimum 6

Other than that it is different circumstances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really not see the obvious differences between Peterson's situation versus that of Hardy? One guy admitted and was indicted for felony child abuse. The other was facing misdemeanor charges in a case that ended up being dismissed altogether.

 

We're not in the court system anymore.

 

We're in the league's disciplinary process, where the NFL generally gets what they want.

 

And if they want to make an example of Hardy, they'll probably succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part that would apply to Hardy would be the judge saying Goodell didn't have authority to suspending him longer than policy dictated at the time of the offense.

Meaning 2 games and not minimum 6

Other than that it is different circumstances

 

Oh, I think he'll get at least four, though I do accept six or more is possible.

 

And yeah, I think it'll stand.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not in the court system anymore.

 

We're in the league's disciplinary process, where the NFL generally gets what they want.

 

And if they want to make an example of Hardy, they'll probably succeed.

 

I think that depends heavily on the information that the NFL may or may not get to look at in relation to the dismissal of the case. But I disagree with how you simply lump this in with Peterson and Rice. They were both clearly guilty of what they were accused of.

 

The case for Hardy in general has basically been a he said/she said from the beginning.

 

He may or may not be suspended, who knows, but I wouldn't count on the NFLPA just laying down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I think he'll get at least four, though I do accept six or more is possible.

And yeah, I think it'll stand.

Again, a lot of this will also depend on what is ruled in Peterson court hearing, which has more implications to Hardy that the Rice ruling.

Judge told NFL in Rice trial that they can't make it up as they go, so they will have to defend their suspension and I imagine it will also end up in a court room.

And there is at least precedent now that the NFLPA attorneys can show the judges ruling which in part said that NFL didn't have authority to suspend Rice longer than what policy dictated at the time of the offense.

We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, a lot of this will also depend on what is ruled in Peterson trial, which has more implications to Hardy that the Rice ruling.

 

Judge told NFL in Rice trial that they can't make it up as they go, so they will have to defend their suspension and I imagine it will also end up in a court room.

 

And there is at least precedent now that the NFLPA attorneys can show the judges ruling which in part said that NFL didn't have authority to suspend Rice longer than what policy dictated at the time of the offense.

 

We will see. 

 

Yet this is what the NFL is still trying to do. Honestly how do you suspend a player for doing all the right things and what door does that open. What next? Girl says she is raped, its proven she was not, Player get suspended 12 games because it was bad PR? Every bad PR thing that happens to a  player cant end in suspension and a fine. Honestly, the NFL needs to let these guys go with a slap and what was already done, then set up hardline rules for anyone else that violates them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone else answer this?

 

Le'Von Bell had a misdemeanor case for marijuana possession pending the whole season, why wasnt he placed on the exempt list?

 

Or is that only Domestic Violence charges?

 

When the NFL bought up this idea about an exempt list, the media mentioned it would be used for all pending charges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
    • I really like Carson Beck’s talent level.  Needs to make better decisions sometimes but I think he could be really good.  Looks like Miami is for real.  Pitt might be interesting at the end of the year but they almost certainly win out 
    • I'll tell you at the end of the year. Right now he's a game manager. 
×
×
  • Create New...