Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Final Decision On Hardy : No Thanks


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Easy sign him back, have alot of loop holes in new contract that depend on behaivor. If he screws up again then trade him. That way we at least get draft picks.

Alot of players in nfl have had second chances.

To let him go and get nothing in return is effing stupid. He is way to valuable. Front office has no balls when it comes to bad press.

 

 

You really believe it's just that easy?

 

Sign him for how much?  He turned down an offer of 8 million a year before, and despite what people keep saying, he's not playing for free.

 

We already spent one season with a good chunk of change dedicated to a guy with off field issues.  Why take that risk again?

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wtf does that mean now?? He's our best now which is all that matters. .

Team sport.

And Pep was the best DE when he left. Jenkins was the best DT.

How did the front look at the end of last season? Looked fine to me. Issue seemed to be secondary. So why are people acting like Hardy makes or breaks it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why we don't win championships. fug I don't even know what to say. Bs.

 

Because we don't throw huge money at time bombs that will likely be suspended for part of the year?

 

Funny, but I recall the team that won a championship just two years ago shipping a talented headache player to the Jets for pretty much nothing.  And yet somehow they amazingly made it back to the championship.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easy sign him back, have alot of loop holes in new contract that depend on behaivor. If he screws up again then trade him. That way we at least get draft picks.

Alot of players in nfl have had second chances.

To let him go and get nothing in return is effing stupid. He is way to valuable. Front office has no balls when it comes to bad press.

Bro, you missed the memo. Panthers don't give 2nd chances. Morals over winning. Haha
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we don't throw huge money at time bombs that will likely be suspended for part of the year?

Funny, but I recall the team that won a championship just two years ago shipping a talented headache player to the Jets for pretty much nothing. And yet somehow they amazingly made it back to the championship.

That's because of there defense. Cause their offense was putrid when they first left him go.
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it or leave approach with him.

He turned down 8 mil before his career was in jeopardy over this. I bet he has changed his tune and realizes he may not make it back into the league.

we don't know if we gave a new over and he turned it down. All the info isn't out yet.

The players and coaches want him back. I believe all the players will be on edge because they know is that all it takes is one accusation from a woman and their career is over, guilty or not, because they can't that the front office will have their back.

Hardy is that good worth the risk, better then getting nothing and having him abuse us when we play against him. If he was around 30 yrs old I'd say good riddance but he's in his damn prime

You really believe it's just that easy?

Sign him for how much? He turned down an offer of 8 million a year before, and despite what people keep saying, he's not playing for free.

We already spent one season with a good chunk of change dedicated to a guy with off field issues. Why take that risk again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much of your salary are you willing to wager that Hardy doesn't get in trouble again?

You're certain he won't, right? Should be no problem to put your money where your mouth is, then.

I didn't say I was giving hardy 13 mil a year, but I would make an offer. And honestly this was the first time he got in serious trouble. All that other poo yall bring up seems petty
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...