Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taking less money


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Word out of Green Bay is that before accepting his new contract from the Packers, Randall Cobb was actually offered a deal that would have paid him two million a year higher by the Oakland Raiders.

 

Although relatively rare, stories of players taking less money from one team than they might have made elsewhere do happen every so often.  Our own Mike Tolbert is an example.  He turned down a higher offer from San Diego than what he ultimately signed for from the Panthers.  Not two million a year higher, mind you, but higher nonetheless.

 

So, putting yourself in the shoes of an NFL free agent (admittedly nice shoes to be in) can you imagine a situation where you'd walk away from something like two million a year to play somewhere else?

 

if so, what sorts of things would factor into that decision?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people are too focused on the money side. Yes money is important but people are different. They are motivated by different things. To assume every player is only after money generalizes all of the players and, Imo, keeps us from looking at them as people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be a smart move in the long run by Cobb.  He's only 24. He'll hit the open market again at 28, plenty young enough to land another big deal.  He'll likely be far better positioned to do that by continuing on with Rodgers and GB than he would be by rolling the dice and going to Oakland.  Could make a lot bigger difference than $2M per year on his next deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cobb's situation is a little different. He's only 24 and if he goes out to Oakland now there's a chance he falls off the face of the earth without a QB and isn't a big deal when he hits the market again. He stays with Rodgers in GB and has another solid 4 years, he'll hit the market again at 28 and could possibly get another solid contract.

Edit: LG beat me to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be a smart move in the long run by Cobb.  He's only 24. He'll hit the open market again at 28, plenty young enough to land another big deal.  He'll likely be far better positioned to do that by continuing on with Rodgers and GB than he would be by rolling the dice and going to Oakland.  Could make a lot bigger difference than $2M per year on his next deal.

 

 

I think Cobb's situation is a little different. He's only 24 and if he goes out to Oakland now there's a chance he falls off the face of the earth without a QB and isn't a big deal when he hits the market again. He stays with Rodgers in GB and has another solid 4 years, he'll hit the market again at 28 and could possibly get another solid contract.

Edit: LG beat me to it

 

 

 

Exactly this.

 

While I'm sure it's tempting to take a higher salary now, Cobb is playing it smart by sticking with the best QB in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The philosophy of the management, the coaching, whether or not the team has a good chance of winning, my role, the camaraderie between teammates, the team culture, whether my family liked the community, how deeply embedded that my roots are within the community and whether I see the place as "home",  standard of living, taxes, etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people are too focused on the money side. Yes money is important but people are different. They are motivated by different things. To assume every player is only after money generalizes all of the players and, Imo, keeps us from looking at them as people.

 

Valid, but to be fair a lot of these guys have families to take care of.

 

Would you wanna go tell your wife and kids you just turned down two million a year extra? :blink:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valid, but to be fair a lot of these guys have families to take care of.

 

Would you wanna go tell your wife and kids you just turned down two million a year extra? :blink:

 

 

That depends on if I'm already making millions or peanuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...