Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Brenton Bersin really that bad?


TN05

Recommended Posts

As a wideout? No, not at all. He had some clutch 3rd down conversions and was solid as a WR, for a #4. Having a play designed for him, like the bubble screen in the playoffs, or the pick 6 to Chancellor, is absolutely fuging absurd though. And is he really that bad on special teams? Yes. Easily one of the worst and least confident returners I've ever seen play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as a wideout. He had some clutch catches last year that moved the chains. I don't think he's more than a 4th or 5th guy, though. If we build up the WR group this offseason like I hope, then chances are high he probably doesn't make the team. He was horrible as a PR, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1stdowncardinals.0.gif

Holy poo that was terrible! First time I ever saw it because no joke, I would LITERALLY walk out of the room everytime the other team had to punt to us, Bersin was just that bad. No, im not joking or saying thst just to say it. Literally walked out of the room and everytime like clock work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"bad" as a WR?  nah, he had some good catches.  Get separation?  No.  Trustworthy as a punt returner?  Never.  Has enough upside as a WR to justify spending a roster spot on him, especially when he's a liability on special teams?  Not really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...