Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes, Shaq was indeed the BPA


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Before the draft I telegraphed to you the top targets in the first round. 

 

Gurley -> Humphries -> Shaq -> Peat .... in that order. This wasn't based on my own opinion, but other sources. 

 

 

True to form, Gettleman chose the BPA and not the position of greatest need. 

 

It was not a reach. Gettleman truly believes Shaq was the most talented football player on the board at 25. 

 

 

He may not have been your BPA, or the media's BPA, but he definitely was Gettleman's. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my only complaint is those cunts in Arizona stole the chance away from us to decide between Humphries and Shaq- that would have been interesting 

 

 

Would have been Humphries

 

 

and yes, would still have been Shaq if Peat was on the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq was only the best player in the minds of Gettleman and his little minions. 

 

Look, I like the guy---Gettleman and Shaq---but neither were the BPA last night.

 

 

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main complaint is: if we had Humphries rated that highly, we should have gone up and got him. Everybody and their mother knew AZ was taking him. Disappointed we didn't move ahead of Det. bc this would have been the year to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

 

 

Before I drank some of that snake oil that Gettleman was selling last year, I was of the opinion that Bell and Chandler were shaky at the very best, and I was also of the opinion that our wide receiving corps was extremely uninspiring and lacking. Well, I hate to tell you, I was correct on both accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Been here since middle school right when it started around 2003 after the charlotte.com one. Living outside of Carolina it was tough to find good Panthers content, news or analysis. And no one to talk to about it. This place gave me a lot though I don’t often post. In the later days, I particularly Loved PhillyB’s write ups. They were fire. Too bad I go let it go. I appreciate the hell out of @MHS831 @TheSpecialJuan @Jackie Lee and others who have been posting great content and keeping this place worth coming back to. Particularly during the offseason. Appreciate y’all!
    • Nice explanation, but I was just messing with you. Thought that would be obvious. I dont have the energy to keep on trolling. Last season I compared our situation with Bryce as a potential Alex Smith, but what we should be looking for is our version of Mahomes. Some people will read that as one sentence, to me that single sentence is equivalent to a half A4 explanationf of the teams pathway forward.
    • I dont know how much of his salary would come across and how much a trade would cost but I feel Kmet would be the sort of TE Canales and Morgan would like 
×
×
  • Create New...