Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Slow 40s and the Panthers


Recommended Posts

If Funchess balls this season, it'll be crazy to see how many teams really do get caught up in 40 times and other measurables at the combine. The panthers.com article about Gettleman sheds some great light on this. How many teams don't do the extra work or don't care about the work that shows these kids' actual playing speed and abilities? It's weird. I think the evidence from last draft shows it, but I think Funchess is an even better, bigger bet by Gettleman in believing in these other traits that other teams either don't see or don't give the proper weight.

 

Also something weird: These other teams don't know how to use guys or get frustrated by their tweener status. But we have clear visions for these players and how they fit. We value this versatility. Not saying we're the only team, obviously the Seahawks do as well, and I'm sure other teams to varying degrees. Maybe it's more the TV analysts who are the frustrated ones. But seriously, it seems other teams aren't willing to think outside the box on these guys and I wonder why not. 

 

I think this is a big draft to prove Gettleman's worth as an evaluator. These picks are more about us as a specific team and our coaches, teammates, and scheme. These are tailor made picks for us and for many outsiders they are both of questionable value. It'll be really exciting to see what happens this season with these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Adams ran a slow 40 too. The difference is USDA BEEF. 

 

I watched some youtube videos of Funchess (im an expert I know). He's more explosive than Kelvin. He jumps higher, has sudden movement, and agility. He's a threat after the catch and his upper body is stacked. Just watching him play in college reminds me of Terrel Owens. 

 

He measures bigger than TO but he has the same bull in a china shop look when he runs into the secondary. 

 

When we picked him I was mad because I really wanted a Lineman but I get it. And I'm starting to like it.

 

 

I've read a lot of predraft profiles on the guy so I too am an except and they tend to point out his lack of after-the-catch ability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys aren't getting the op, I know these guys play plenty fast enough just wondering why they're combine 40 times are so much slower than what they can actually do at pro days.

 

There's no one reason.  It's different in each case.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've been reading too many PanthersUnited threads.

 

He he he.  I will give PantherUnited credit for a few things.  He is consistent and seems to have a thick skin.  He put his nuts on the chopping block about Thomas and was right.

 

And he seems to love his Panthers and talking about them with us. 

 

But yeah, some of those threads....jeez.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, 4.64 is not slow for a LB.  (Our LBs are actually faster than our CBs).  But you have a good point.  However, we are finding value in tweeners and combine under performers.  The reason I (and some of you) were horrified when Thompson and Funchess's names were announced is because we studied the reports where these players were devalued by the "experts".  However, lets look at what we actually got/did:

 

Thomas:  We upgraded a weakness on our defense.  Klein lacked cover skills and had to be removed from the field after first down.  Thomas is a baller--a playmaker on defense.  He has game speed.  A bit undersized and a bit of a tweener.  "Experts" can't handle it if they can't put a player in a box and label him.  They do not know what a team might do with a player like that, so they devalue that player.  No biggie.  Thomas has first-round talent. 

 

Funchess is also a tweener who had a slowish combine and some pedestrian numbers during the season.  He had a toe injury, something most don't take seriously because it is not an Achilles or knee, so he struggled a bit and ran a slow time at the combine. Come on.  If he is healthy, he is as good as Benjamin if he had Winston.  Nobody complained about Benjamin at #28 last year, so why complain about the faster Funchess at #41?

 

Gettlemen is finding value by knocking the dust and grime off the players.  I see what they mean when they say both had first round grades.  They do not read the same crap we read when formulating opinions.  

 

Have you not learned yet to appreciate what Gettlemen and Co. do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read a lot of predraft profiles on the guy so I too am an except and they tend to point out his lack of after-the-catch ability. 

 

I'm sure the stuff you read was just as qualified as me. The one thing I will say is it was a miracle when a QB got him the ball. Forget hitting him in stride. He had lot's of awkward catches that could not be turned up field. But when he had the time to turn he was shifty, albeit against college secondaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...