Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

N.C. Sen. Bob Rucho questions Panthers ticket increases


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I am sure that if I lived in Charlotte, I would be charmed like a cobra mesmerized by a snake charmer by the thought of putting down my hard earned bucks to attend Panthers games, despite the Panthers FO's seemingly unnecessary price increases that come each season, just as sure as the sun comes up in the morning.  These cost-of-being-a-Panthers-fan increases are the antitheses of cost of living increases that have a difficult time just transcending pure rhetoric in today's economy.    

 

Senator Bob Rucho has questioned why his ticket prices keep increasing, notwithstanding tax breaks given to the team.

 

“I told (Panthers president Danny) Morrison this the other day: I said, ‘You know, we lowered your corporate taxes, we lowered the (personal) income tax, we cleaned up the issue of what was a (3 percent gross-receipts) tax embedded into my Panther tickets and yet for the last two years I’ve increased (my payments because of higher prices),’ ” Rucho told me. “‘Explain to me why that is.’”

 

 

The Panthers are blaming the increases on the sales tax of sport and entertainment tickets.  It doesn't sound like Rucho is totally happy with that nebulous answer.

 

It's not a mystery, senator. I just chock it up as an offshoot of the disingenuous theory of trickle down economics, Mr. Rucho. The rich get richer, and the working man gets screwed.  :) ... :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1995: $50.00 per seat per game

2015: $120.00 per seat per game (not including almost $100.00 in handling fees & sales tax for 2 seats)

 

 

I'd say more than a cost of living thing. Product of supply & demand ..... or greed.

 

Pie for your "It's not a mystery, senator. I just chock it up as an offshoot of the disingenuous theory of trickle down economics, Mr. Rucho. The rich get richer, and the working man gets screwed." comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe because the team made the playoffs for the first time in consecutive years, appears to be on a big upswing and has arguably more young starpower than ever before?

 

If that was the case, where are the decreases when the team sucks like a Hoover? We have more of those seasons (and actually got ticket price increases following horrible seasons) than the good ones, yet we've never gotten a refund or price reduction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1995: $50.00 per seat per game

2015: $120.00 per seat per game (not including almost $100.00 in handling fees & sales tax for 2 seats)

 

 

I'd say more than a cost of living thing. Product of supply & demand ..... or greed.

 

Pie for your "It's not a mystery, senator. I just chock it up as an offshoot of the disingenuous theory of trickle down economics, Mr. Rucho. The rich get richer, and the working man gets screwed." comment.

 

Salary cap in 1995 - 37 million

Salary cap in 2015 - 143 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Salary cap in 1995 - 37 million

Salary cap in 2015 - 143 million

Luxury jobs become more luxurious

How much should an athlete make to the standard blue collar/average worker? Is an athlete more valuable to society then the blue collar/average worker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Salary cap in 1995 - 37 million

Salary cap in 2015 - 143 million

The salary cap goes up in direct proportion to their profits, it has no effect on ticket prices. You want to argue increases for taxes, inflation, etc you'd at least have an argument for some increases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The salary cap goes up in direct proportion to their profits, it has no effect on ticket prices. You want to argue increases for taxes, inflation, etc you'd at least have an argument for some increases.

Supply and demand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luxury jobs become more luxurious

How much should an athlete make to the standard blue collar/average worker? Is an athlete more valuable to society then the blue collar/average worker?

 

 

Supply and demand

 

Answered your own question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...