Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Wide Receiver Depth Chart - OTA Week 2


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

​Why do people think bersin is terrible? yeah at punt/kickoff return he is god awful. But at wr he got us plenty of first downs on third down. He isn't fast but he catches nearly everything thrown his way and cam seems content with him,

Because he got his hair cut? You know, for the kids. Hair cut info here

idk. All this "debating" about the 4/5 WR seems pointless. Better people than me will make that decision and that's why they get the big bucks.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he got his hair cut? You know, for the kids. Hair cut info here

idk. All this "debating" about the 4/5 WR seems pointless. Better people than me will make that decision and that's why they get the big bucks.  

Good point. I don't understand why so many huddlers get set on a name and come hail or high water they are going to pull for that player to make it over anyone, even if another player out plays their anointed favorite.

I got faith that our coaching staff can evaluate talent and place them appropriately on the depth chart. The only name im pulling for is the Carolina Panthers. In the end I just want the most talented players to make the cut, wether it's Bersin, Hill, Cotchery, or a player yet to be named is irrelevant.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

​He can catch, but we need speed even the whole coaching staff has said this.  We got enough receivers that can "catch."   

​speed also needs to catch the ball. let us not forget that k.b. had many drops that were wide open. i cannot recall bersin dropping anything that was not tipped. the team needs clutch receivers that cam can count on, bersin is that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bersin represents everything a lot of very dumb users on this site hate about this organization

there aren't a lot of wide receivers in the NFL that are 4th or 5th on depth charts that absolutely smoke him.  his skillset and stats are pretty typical of his role.  oh but dur he wouldn't be in the NFL if it wasn't for al davis i mean jerry richard$on amirite

he's extremely cheap, can be cut with almost no loss (if any at all), and is a halfway competent possession receiver.  i'll never understand the out of control over the top butthurt over the fact that he has a roster spot.  as if having some other scrub at the bottom of the depth chart would make us a significantly better team.

​OK Mr.Richardson , he reliable but he gets punked down when real CB's get physical with him, we shall see in preseason if he is worth it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly can't quite get my hands around the Hill love and the Bersin hate.

 

Huge 3rd down, in a big game....who do you want trying to convert?  The guy who can't catch, or the guy who can't beat the press and slips while running his route leaving Cam with no option resulting in a late forced throw to the right side of the field that is picked off by Cam Chancelor and ran back for a touchdown to seal our playoff fate?

​I'll take anyone else...thanks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​OK Mr.Richardson , he reliable but he gets punked down when real CB's get physical with him, we shall see in preseason if he is worth it.

Thinking Bersin gets a hat over Hill because he went to Woford is laughable. Hill was on the PS last year and 31 other teams could have plucked him away. None of them did. I am not buying into the conspiracy that Jerry reserves roster spots for pets. This is ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking Bersin gets a hat over Hill because he went to Woford is laughable. Hill was on the PS last year and 31 other teams could have plucked him away. None of them did. I am not buying into the conspiracy that Jerry reserves roster spots for pets. This is ridiculous.

​My post was talking about his "huddle name" and his rant. I know he is not getting any benefit  from Richardson, just messing with dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People in here arguing about Hill, Bersin, Cotchery and Philly LMAO, I wonder if any of them would even be in NFL rosters if it wasn't for the panthers.

 

Here's hoping Kelvin, Funchess, Olsen and Ginn are enough for the passing game to be successful

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People in here arguing about Hill, Bersin, Cotchery and Philly LMAO, I wonder if any of them would even be in NFL rosters if it wasn't for the panthers.

 

Here's hoping Kelvin, Funchess, Olsen and Ginn are enough for the passing game to be successful

Dude, why is it you have so much hate for any Panther receivers not named Benjiman,  Funchess, Olsen or Ginn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...