Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Plan for Star


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I do not think you understand what roster depth is for a team. CJ and KK are not depth.

Dwan Edwards, Colin Cole, Kyle Love, Mario Addison, and Wes Horton. That is the depth. Can you put a formidable front up with any 4 of that group? And we have had this issue since 2011. Expecting different results by doing the same things is Gettleman/Rivera motto.

The LBs do not plug leaks. The DL keeps bodies off the LBs to allow them to move and get to the ball. A poor DL will decline the performance of even the best LB in the league.

Our depth right now is better than our starters in 2010-2011.. You really can't compare them. Antwan Applewhite? Frank Kearse? Andre Neblett? Jason Shirley? Nick Hayden? Edwards, Cole, and Addison are proven players. Horton and Love are a little less proven but they have what it takes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you understand what roster depth is for a team. CJ and KK are not depth.

Dwan Edwards, Colin Cole, Kyle Love, Mario Addison, and Wes Horton. That is the depth. Can you put a formidable front up with any 4 of that group? And we have had this issue since 2011. Expecting different results by doing the same things is Gettleman/Rivera motto.

The LBs do not plug leaks. The DL keeps bodies off the LBs to allow them to move and get to the ball. A poor DL will decline the performance of even the best LB in the league.

we are not deep at nose tackle.

we are deep on the defensive line as a unit, which gives us the flexibility to not be deep at nose tackle for a short period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Our depth right now is better than our starters in 2010-2011.. You really can't compare them. Antwan Applewhite? Frank Kearse? Andre Neblett? Jason Shirley? Nick Hayden? Edwards, Cole, and Addison are proven players. Horton and Love are a little less proven but they have what it takes. 

Are you really going back to the 2010 season to make the argument that the Panthers depth is better? A three legged dog is better than a two legged dog, but it is still not capable of running with the big dogs on all four legs. 

Edwards, Cole, Addison, and Horton give up big runs and take more than 3 seconds to get to the QB. Not good at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but don't see the depth you speak of. This team needs all its starters to have a chance at the playoffs.

Not sure how anyone would call the Panthers deep at any position outside of QB. Most teams have quality starters as depth. That is not the case in Carolina, and opposing teams will exploit that fact.

for you to say this, tells me you dont know much about the Panthers' roster. not doubting your fandom or anything, but this is about as incorrect as one can get about the Panthers. it really reminds me of what the media says about the team.

QB - 1 generational superstar and 2 backups that could start for a team in the right situation

RB - 1 stud RB, 1 shifty, situational vet, and 2 young backups that could be the future at the position. yes Stewart might get hurt, but i am confident with what ive seen from CAP, Wegher, and Fozzy that if Stewart goes down, our committee will match at least 75% of Stew's production

FB - 1 hard-hitting, power fullback that adds an invaluable extra dimension to our offense (one that is MUCH needed with our inept OC)

TE - 1 top 3 TE, 1 above average, pass-catching backup, and 1 young backup that has been prevented from showing much potential due to injuries

OL - finally a starting line that has played together all preseason, and has performed admirably throughout the preseason. Run-blocking is suspect, but seeing how the Panthers are a run-first team, this should be fixed very soon if not already. 2nd and 3rd stringers shouldnt start as a unit, but will be adequate backups and rotational players.

WR - only depth concern on the offense. Although, the deficiency here can be schemed around. i mentioned in a separate thread earlier today that having Ted Ginn and Philly Brown both split wide actually makes alot of sense. They can stretch the perimeter while the sure-handed Cotchery and Olsen, promising rookie Funchess, and promising newcomer Norwood can wreak havoc underneath. Not to mention that our RB's have proven they can be a valuable asset catching dump-off passes from underneath. Yes, Philly needs to catch the damn ball. But this group is capable of surprising people i think. perhaps im being too optimistic, but i think they will surprise people this season.

DE - semi-concerning. Charles Johnson will be a stud. he might take some time to get going, but Jacksonville and Houston should be good games to get into a rhythm. Kony Ealy came on strong toward the end of the preseason and while he will have his struggles against the better OLs of the league, i think he will make an adequate counterbalance to CJ. Mario Addison pushed Kony and Frank Alexander for the starting spot and would be an adequate backup for Kony IMHO. Wes Horton would be a drop in talent, but i dont think the drop would be too great. If the Panthers sign Da'Quan Bowers, i will not be concerned about the depth here at DE at all.

DT - KK Short should start in the opener, and the importance of that cannot be overstated. He should be ready to go, even though he missed alot of the preseason with back spasms. Yes, Lotulelei might be out. But Edwards, Cole, and Love are more than adequate backups. They are older, for sure. But they were more than serviceable last season and performed very well this preseason. there should be no concern for this position.

LB - do i really need to go there?

CB - concern. and thats only because there are only 4 of them. The coaching staff wouldnt have only kept 4 if they were worried about any of them being out for the opener. This is a talent-deep CB corps where Bene could start in his own right and will probably still be in on a hell of alot of snaps, and Teddy Williams will be adequate to give someone else a breather. Lets not forget that the Panthers kept Colin Jones, who is a hybrid Safety/Nickleback and has performed very well in the nickle package. 

Safety - concern. Any safety corps that starts Roman Harper is concerning. But Sean McDermott is actually good at his job, unlike his offensive (pun intended) counterpart, and i highly doubt that Harper will be in on alot of pass plays. He is best in run support and i think one of the other safeties takes his place on obvious passing plays. Tre Boston struggled last year, as can be expected for a rookie 4th rounder, and Dean Marlowe is largely unproven (though he did earn a roster spot after going undrafted this year). Marlowe flashed in preseason, and might continue his performance as an adequate backup during the regular season. Kurt Coleman brings much needed attitude and talent to this safety unit. no concern there. and as mentioned earlier, Colin Jones can play the safety position and can be trusted to fill in while someone needs a breather. 

 

It is ignorant to claim that the Panthers' roster has no depth. This is the deepest roster we have had in many, many years. i dont fault anyone for not knowing about the depth the Panthers have achieved, but it does suggest where they get their information from (the media).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is ignorant to claim that the Panthers' roster has no depth. This is the deepest roster we have had in many, many years. i dont fault anyone for not knowing about the depth the Panthers have achieved, but it does suggest where they get their information from (the media).

 

Depth: A large number of good players.

That is the definition. This does not mean a top layer of good players followed by average, mediocre, and project/potential players.

Your post supported my point. When you look at depth of a team you do not list the starters as the foundation to your argument. Remove the starters, and then tell me how good the second team is for the Panthers. If you look at a second team unit and think that they would be a liability in winning a game, then they are not good depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think you understand what roster depth is for a team. CJ and KK are not depth.

Dwan Edwards, Colin Cole, Kyle Love, Mario Addison, and Wes Horton. That is the depth. Can you put a formidable front up with any 4 of that group? And we have had this issue since 2011. Expecting different results by doing the same things is Gettleman/Rivera motto.

The LBs do not plug leaks. The DL keeps bodies off the LBs to allow them to move and get to the ball. A poor DL will decline the performance of even the best LB in the league.

im sorry but didnt our depth spank everyone elses depth in preseason? Get out of here with that poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im sorry but didnt our depth spank everyone elses depth in preseason? Get out of here with that poo

Derek Anderson and Joe Webb brought the Panthers back in the first 2 games, we lost the 3rd game, and the Steelers depth is awful. They too need all their starters to be healthy. I already said the Panthers have good depth at QB. It is the rest of the team that is unproven or mediocre, and they will be a huge liability if elevated to a starting role.

You also have a very loose use of the term "spank". The only dominant performance was against the Steelers, and most of the ones that dominated (Bersin, Lucas, Cox, Todman, Simonson, Boykin) are no longer on the active roster. So, you cannot count them as depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depth: A large number of good players.

That is the definition. This does not mean a top layer of good players followed by average, mediocre, and project/potential players.

Your post supported my point. When you look at depth of a team you do not list the starters as the foundation to your argument. Remove the starters, and then tell me how good the second team is for the Panthers. If you look at a second team unit and think that they would be a liability in winning a game, then they are not good depth.

you expect depth to be starting caliber? please. no team in the NFL is three deep at every postion with starting caliber players. 

i consider "good depth" to consist of players that shouldnt start, but could if need be (or could fill in adequately when the starter needs a rest). 

my whole post was meant to show you that the Panthers' roster is filled with guys that can fill in for a few snaps, or (in many cases) a game or two, without much drop off.

your point about stripping away the starters and asking if the team would win is ill-advised. No team in the NFL could do that and win games. im not even sure how to answer that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...