Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Week 1 PFF Grades - Defense


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Josh Norman leads the defensive rankings this week, which should be obvious. Dwan Edwards and Kyle Love are at the bottom, highlighting a real need for Star to be healthy soon. 

PFF was not as forgiving of Kony Ealy as Ron Rivera was. Rivera stated Ealy was doing more of the grunt work, but his lack of pass rush remains a problem. 

 

Defensive summary

 Play CountsRatings 
Pos.#NameTotalRunRushCov.OverallRun DefensePass RushPass Cov.Penalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB HuBPTksAssMTStops
 LCB24 Josh Norman *67191474.30.6-0.13.70.10-0    5112
 WLB58 Thomas Davis *67196423.31.90.01.30.10-01   6  5
 MLB59 Luke Kuechly *31111192.00.70.40.90.00-01 1 62 2
 MLB56 A.J. Klein3783261.51.2-0.20.50.00-0    51 1
 RCB31 Charles Tillman *57182371.40.1-0.21.40.10-0    4  1
 DLE96 Wes Horton2061400.80.40.30.00.10-0 1  1   
 DRE97 Mario Addison3122720.4-0.50.80.00.10-0211    2
 DLT99 Kawann Short *40132700.31.1-0.90.00.10-0  1 2  2
 SCB25 Ben� Benwikere51110400.20.60.0-0.50.10-0    5223
 SS42 Colin Jones90090.10.00.00.10.00-0        
 FS33 Tre Boston32010.00.00.00.00.00-0        
 DLE95 Charles Johnson *5415381-0.31.7-2.20.00.20-01 1 1  2
 SLB54 Shaq Thompson *171016-0.3-0.3-0.10.10.00-0     1  
 DRT91 Colin Cole14590-1.2-0.7-0.50.00.00-0        
 SS41 Roman Harper *6417245-1.20.2-0.2-1.30.10-0    1   
 FS20 Kurt Coleman *6618543-1.9-0.8-0.4-0.80.10-0    3121
 DRE94 Kony Ealy *4216260-2.3-0.8-1.70.00.20-0    1 11
 DLT92 Dwan Edwards428340-3.0-2.8-0.30.00.10-0  2     
 DRT93 Kyle Love *2511140-3.5-2.9-0.70.00.10-0    1   

 


View full article

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...