Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Cotch is back for Seattle who gets cut, if anyone?


WesleyM

Recommended Posts

Today coach Rivera said it was possible Cotch would be healthy for the Seattle game. My question is does anyone get the axe with him becoming active? I honestly believe Bersin has contributed enough over the last few weeks to stay on the roster. He is a great posession guy. My thought is to cut the guy from Seattle and if he clears waviers add him to the PS. It is clear he hasnt picked up the system and I would think if a danger of him getting picked up existed we probably would have given more than a conditional 7th to get the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I'm glad none of you are GMs cutting a guy that's barely seen the field? Who has potential and is young? Y'all are getting crazy in the Huddle these days

I'm sure no GM wants to cut a guy. But it has to happen. 

It's not that you want to cut guy, but we are playing to win. If Norwood can't help that right now, bye. Say hi to the practice squad. His turn might come again this year. Who do you propose we cut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean he is on the roster, we could just make a different player inactive, but that would be too logical.

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct.

Cotchery isn't on IR.  They don't absolutely have to cut anybody if he's healthy.  They can just deactivate someone.

Now, it is possible that they might, but they don't have to.

Stop, the both of you!

Knowledge of the rules and logic have no place in the huddle!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...