Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Have We Really Beaten Anyone?

Plewis

By Plewis,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted

Here's my point, it's not who we beat, but what we beat them with.  Name me one other 4-0 team that lost their top receiver, best defensive lineman, and best defensive player (and arguably best defensive player in the NFL).  No one in the NFL has weathered injuries as well as we have and that is a fact.  If we're a 4-0 team with these injuries, my guess is when we're healthy we're a pretty damn good team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FreshDelaire Newbie

FreshDelaire

Posted
Posted

Based on your post count and, more importantly, your response I can tell you don't actually read what you reply to.

He didn't need to read it. You made the same thread that has been made about 50 times in the last week. We haven't beaten a single team with a winning record. Neither has Atlanta, Green Bay, New England, Cincy, or Denver. Get over it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

We've beaten everyone they've scheduled us to play so far. This is the NFL, not the WWE ... we can't just sneak attack the Patriots on their practice field and go four quarters on them.

 

That would be pretty wild if you got one surprise game a year... Danged Patriots would bring in a folding metal chair every time, though.

 This is the best idea ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

The teams we've beaten have beaten the following teams:

Dallas

New Orleans

Tampa Bay

Miami

So now the Huddle is so pessimistic that they want to play Six Degrees to Kevin Bacon to say our 4-0 record is worse than any of the other undefeated teams.

You guys need to attend a Positive Thinking Seminar....I swear, I am amazed that many of you have not killed yourselves already based on how pessimistic and depressing your posts are (not that I want anyone to kill themselves).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...