Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Older fans, who ya got? Olsen or Walls?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

Most of the posters here are probably too young to remember Wesley Walls and what he meant to the franchise in the 90s, but the guy could block, run, and catch.  He was pretty much our first homegrown star, even if he was drafted by another team.  The guy could do it all, and established records that stood until Olsen came along in a much friendlier passing era.

If you were building a team from scratch and got to choose between all Panthers players to date in their prime, which player would you start at Tight End?  And why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think your memory is that good if you think Walls could block.  Fox let him go because he could not block.  But he probably had the best hands of any player in Panther history.  If you threw it within 5 yards of him he would find a way to catch it.  With that being said I would still rather have Olsen.  He is faster and a better blocker, now.  When Olsen first got here he was on the Walls level of blocking but now he is pretty good at it.  Walls was not the athlete that Olsen is but damn, he could catch everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends of offense and QB

For Steve B, Walls was a great TE, For Cam N and our downfield attack, not many fit better than Olsen.

 

Two different offensive systems, two different QB's and two different TE's.  I think Olsen has been asked to do more, especially with the blocking assignments.  Not that he has mastered it yet, but I think covering more responsibilities than Walls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends of offense and QB

For Steve B, Walls was a great TE, For Cam N and our downfield attack, not many fit better than Olsen.

 

Two different offensive systems, two different QB's and two different TE's.  I think Olsen has been asked to do more, especially with the blocking assignments.  Not that he has mastered it yet, but I think covering more responsibilities than Walls.

Ditto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walls complained about blocking all the time much like Tony G did. He was a heck of a player, but I'd even choose Kris Mangum over him. Mangum may not have the numbers of Walls or Olsen but he did everything. Lunch pail type of team player. But I'd choose Greg Olsen over them all, cerebral type of team player willing to do anything to win.

 

Mangum_jumps_Samuel_091805.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
×
×
  • Create New...