Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith says that Champ Bailey is the best CB he's ever faced, takes shot at JNo?


Icege

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/denver-broncos/post/_/id/16053/steve-smith-says-champ-bailey-best-cornerback-hes-ever-faced
 

Quote

 

“And I think that’s kinda been lost a little bit in this day and age,’’ Smith continued. “You hear a guy who says he’s a lock-down corner, but let a guy go in the slot, and he’s nowhere to be found. Let a guy line up at No. 3 [wide receiver], and he stays outside … and then they go to a different coverage. Well, you can’t be lock-down if you’re only locking down certain portions of the field.’’

“It’s so hard now because there are a ton of good corners,” Smith said. “But the reason that I really just say Champ is because everybody wants to talk about the success of all these guys who are in their fourth or fifth years. I’m in my 15th year, and I’m 36. Some of these guys, when I was a rookie, were in elementary school. So I’m not going to crown a guy who’s been in the league six years and had three years of success and three years of failure or average. I want to see how he is in three or four more years when his speed goes, and he has to learn how to use his technique. That’s just me, but that’s where I feel like the legacy is built.’

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related:

http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25363239/champ-bailey-josh-norman-is-ridiculous-should-be-paid-as-the-top-cb

 

Quote

"His instincts are ridiculous," Bailey said,

 per Black and Blue Review

. "You don't play Cover 3 and then jump routes like he does. You don't just do that without film study or without confidence. And you see deep balls where he looks like he's beat, but that's all part of his setup. People don't understand it, but this guy is long and athletic, and he knows it, so he wants you to throw the ball."

Bailey also said Norman is deserving of a big pay raise. "No doubt," Bailey said. "If it just started this year, then I'd be reluctant, I'd say show me more. But this goes back into last year.

"To have a whole offseason to prepare and come out and match up against the best guys and hold your own and still be rated the top corner in the game? No doubt, he should be paid as the top corner in the game."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's got a pretty good point.

 

But the media isn't like it was 10 years ago. Now a days, someone needs to be crowned the best and talked about 24/7...embrace debate as they say. So ultimately, it really doesn't matter who is being talked about as "the best", because next year the conversation will be reset and everyone will have forgotten about what was said in 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naw I don't think that's a slam at Josh. Smitty is right though about the consistency year in and year out. But at the same time you can't fault a corner who is told to play where he is told to play and excels. Josh is a shutdown corner but I think that definition has changed as the game has evolved from when smitty is talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He specifically points out the slot situation, which is the biggest criticism of Josh Norman around the league. So I have to say it very well may be a shot at Norman. And if so? he needs to worry about the ravens and helping develop Pickles. He needs to chill out on the panthers, and maybe he still gets an invite to our super bowl party?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a shot at Norman. Was Norman even playing when we played the Ravens last year?  Practice doesn't even count for stuff like this, Smitty might not have even been considering Norman.  Plus, while Norman is the best in the league right now, it'd be pretty audacious to say he's the best in the past 15 years or so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh is an up and coming young player that's still making his mark.  Champ is an established veteran who played great for a decade.  I don't think it's a shot but even if it was, the Josh Norman star didn't start to rise until SS89 was shipped out of town.  This is not the same Josh Norman SS89 faced in practice 3 years ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May not have been a shot a Josh... but it was definitely shade. 

You guys dont remember the training camp where Josh Norman came in and the news was that he seemed to be getting the best of Steve Smith? I remember hearing of Josh's big time plays early in his career. It seemed that Josh was getting in his own way early in his career and he was being put in the dog house early because of his firey attitude... which at the time didn't mesh well with the other top dogs on the team. 

We loved Steve Smith, but he was a bully... it's how he got the edge. He may not directly mentioning Josh Norman,  but if you think that he wasnt thinking of Josh Norman when you read this means that you havent been paying attention to Steve Smith his entire career. 

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/9033/norman-on-smith-we-had-a-little-twist-of-words

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d829de05b/article/steve-smith-trades-barbs-with-teammate-josh-norman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IMON KRAQUE said:

He specifically points out the slot situation, which is the biggest criticism of Josh Norman around the league. So I have to say it very well may be a shot at Norman. And if so? he needs to worry about the ravens and helping develop Pickles. He needs to chill out on the panthers, and maybe he still gets an invite to our super bowl party?

There are a bunch of top CBS that don't go in the slot. Revis is one of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty isn't keeping in mind how much the chips are stacked his way these days.   

 

I don't know how guys are able to play good defense these days.  

 

Also, used to be you weren't a quality receiver if you had to step inside to get open.   I don't remember when CBs were asked to step inside to get respect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...