Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Arizona or Greenbay?


CamMoon

Recommended Posts

I know, I know it's Seattle week but I honestly think we should but the chickens by 3 touchdowns at a minimum, save divine intervention we should beat Seattle. That said, I'll be rooting hard for Arizona because I want to smash them in the mouth and get revenge for a certain playoff game that sent this team back a half decade. Plus, I would much rather play Carson fuging Palmer than Aaron Rogers every day of the week. KP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's more to football than a QB.  GB's defense is awful, and their run game isn't good.  On the flip side, Zona has an average QB, average RB, and pretty much top tier talent EVERYWHERE else.  Zona is the ONLY team that truly worries me amongst the remaining teams in the playoffs.  We're better, but not by enough that I think we could absorb a negative turnover game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

I'd prefer the Packers for sure. Once we make the Super Bowl, the easiest team would be the Chiefs. Our roster would WRECK the Chiefs.

The Chiefs are good...DVOA says so!!! Bwahahaha 

yeah, the Chiefs really are good.  But they have Alex Smith.  Alex Smith Alex Smith Alex Smith.  In the Super Bowl.  Would be too good to be true.

image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JJman Returns said:

fug this easy poo. I want Arizona then New England. Besides honestly I'd rather play Carson Palmer then Aaron Rodgers in the NFCC game. But yea, Seattle now

Yup. I want the hardest possible road. That means roll Seattle on Sunday then obliterate the Cards the next week. And then 2 short weeks after that humiliate the Patriots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...